We spend a lot of time trying to decide what's porn and what isn't around here, so it can be a relief to go to a museum, where we can be reasonably assured that any naked body parts are art, not porn. But a couple of recent news stories seem to be blurring the line between the two.First there is the team of husband-and-wife artisans who are fighting to preserve the centuries-old Portuguese handicraft of penis ceramics. Francisco and Casilda Figueiredo have spent the past 30 years lovingly shaping and molding the ceramic penis mugs, penis-shaped bottles and ceramic soccer figures with the male member popping out from under a flag. The tradition is said to have started in 1861 B.J.J. (before Jenna Jameson).
Then there's the Bay Area shopkeeper who was asked by police to cover the engorged member of a Balinese statue he keeps in his shop's window. The fuzz say the wooden statue is pornographic; Robert Hedric, the Castro merchant, insists it is art.
So how do you tell dirty nudity from the fancy kind? Seriously, we need to know, so we can decide whether or not we should feel guilty about ogling Aphrodite's hot rack in "The Birth of Venus."



























Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 11 July
By Gary Olszewski
A penis-shaped coffee mug is no big deal. But to take care of both genders, let's see a beer mug shaped like a woman's vula, you dont have to sip throught the tiny hole, you can chug from the vagina!
Reply
Sunday 13 July
By Bill Mack
What a joke
Reply
Friday 18 July
By remark504
Good question.... If it makes the majority of men pop a woody...Or the majority of women moist...it's porn.
Reply
Wednesday 30 July
By boredwell
One: the dad could take his kids and walk on the opposite side of the street. Two: i wonder if asked, if he also complains to the FCC re: violence on tv. Three: did he ever hear of sex education. Four: Perhaps he needs a lesson on the US Constitution. Five: Would he therefore have Most of the city's galleries and museums declared pornographic? Five: The "official" reaction by police was, in fact, a violation of the 1st Amendment.Acting in the best interests of one while ignoring that of others is a BIG NO NO! Six: Mr Brick, to thwart potential trouble meisters, might consider putting a description-along with the price-on the provenance of the statue. Six: There are no ordinances or statutes in the city that I know of seeking to proscribe the 1st Amendment. Seven: the father-pedestrian exercised his right of free speech and opinion while, ironically, seeking to prohibit the store's owner from doing the same. Universal Rights are in the "share and share alike" category! Those who have others believe "giving" rights that they enjoy and, in fact, take for granted, should be reserved for themselves (ie, gay marriage=SPECIAL rights)are the SPECIAL GROUPs with SPECIAL interests.Eight: As for the "lesbian" mom's complaints to Mr Dufy re: porn displays in the castro - she needs to get a life before she goes and ruins her kids!
Reply
Sunday 03 August
By Zach Jordan
Hey Gary, have you ever seen the vagina pillow?? Equality is wonderful! Hang your dick out everywhere.
Check out va-jay-jay products (kinda creepy huh)
http://www.badmimi.com/shop/products/
Reply