1 Comment










Last time, we asked you whether Guinness-book-worthy long tongues and videos of them waggling constituted pornography, and as usual, 63 percent of you said no. Via our weird cousins at Urlesque, we have learned about another freaky fetish and once again, we need your input.

Some of us in the office didn't think that swimming fully clothed sounded like such a weird fetish, until we started clicking through the completely unsexy photographs of men and women swimming in business suits and other everyday wear on the Swimming Fully Clothed (NSFW? kind of? maybe?) Web site.

Being sexually aroused by getting wet or watching others get wet while wearing clothing is known as "wetlook." Subsets of the title concept include photos of people wearing clothes in bathtubs and showers, dry girls soaking fully clothed men, movie stills of wet clothed couples, underwater galleries, dunk tanks and even baptism photos. On the forums, posters describe their fantasies, such as sitting in a kiddie pool wearing "a suit and tie ... complete with socks/boxers, and black wingtip shoes" and a "dream pool splash" fully clothed into a hotel pool.

Like so much "Is It Porn" fodder, there's nothing technically sexual about these photographs, but they are obviously doing something for somebody out there on the pervy ol' Internet. And so we ask you, the pundits of pornography, to weigh in on the poll.