The NYPD is now requiring its recruits to log onto their MySpace and Facebook pages so that investigators can check their private postings for inappropriate material. Previously, the department had just used Google searches to run background checks, but reports of cops using social networking sites to display videos of police brutality and other abuses of power encouraged them to expand their screening efforts.
The debate over how much access employers should have to employees' Web activity stretches way beyond our boys in blue. By now everybody knows that the wrong kind of photos left public on a MySpace account could prevent you from getting hired. And pretending you're sick, then posting about being hungover on Facebook can get you fired. But should it really be your boss's business what you post on your private pages after you get the job?
After the jump we talk malicious urination, TPS reports and whether cops are the exception in this Web 2.0 dilemma.
No way
Your off-the-clock activities are your own business, and that includes social networking done off the clock. Sure, if a fellow employee notices that you have joined a Facebook group called "I piss in the office coffee machine," that is going to become a legitimate workplace issue that would likely lead to dismissal. But as long as you know how to keep your Web activity private, it is none of your boss's concern, and you shouldn't be presumed guilty.
Unfortunately yes
There is no such thing as web privacy when whatever appears in cyberspace is just a screen shot away from the inbox of millions. In the case of the NYPD, the cop that had a MySpace account with pictures of women posing topless in front of his squad car was surely disciplined. Nevertheless, he still did damage to the department's reputation. It's a brave new world, and one in which the concept of privacy is being redefined.
It depends on the job
If you have a job that comes with social responsibility, like a cop or a teacher or a priest, maybe it's appropriate for employers to keep tabs on what you do on the net. But if you are Worker 2472, filling out TPS reports on the the 14th floor, who cares if there is a stack of empties and a pool of vomit in every photo that you have ever been tagged in?


























Lingerie Worker Claims She Was Fired For Being 'Too Hot'
Billboard Music Awards Red Carpet 2012 (PHOTOS)
What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
'Undercover Boss': 5 Most Gripping Moments From Season 3
Why Facebook's Falling Share Price Really Doesn't Matter
Peter Jones Dead: Crowded House Drummer Dies of Brain Cancer at 45
Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan: A Romantic Facebook Timeline
Facebook's IPO Debacle, Day 3: Un-Friended and Dis-Liked on Wall Street
Vet Saves His Own Cat's Life After Car Accident
Jennifer Lopez, Casper Smart TV Show: J.Lo to Star in Reality Series With Boyfriend (REPORT)







Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 23 January
By June
It's not "private" if it's on the web.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By Tom
First, you shouldn't be using a publicly owned computer for private e-mails or business. And, unless the company approves of such use, the same should apply to company owned machines. Also, use of a computer for personal business during your work shift is cheating the agency or company; just as much as taking unauthorized breaks or sneaking out early before the work shift is completed. Use of company machines and company time would seem to imply that anything in that machine is company property. Tom
Reply
Friday 23 January
By JC
Nobody said this guy was using a company computer to do his MySpace posting. . . just that he posted pics of his squad car on his MySpace page. He could easily have done this at home on his own computer. In fact, given that he's a cop, that's probably exactly what he did - most cops (and lots of other people) don't have the luxury of sitting around in an office playing on a computer - their own or their employer's - for 8 hours a day.
Saturday 24 January
By Sunbeamer
OM WHO ARE YOU THE WORK POLICE
Monday 26 January
By TED
BOY, ARE YOU DUMB.
Friday 23 January
By undrgrndgirl
employers have no right to keep tabs on employees after hours...facebook or the books on my bedside table...
however employees DO have responsibilities to keep on the job confidentiality even after hours - for example doctors and nurses should not post pictures of patient's surgeries or procedures on facebook; teachers should not discuss students; cops should not post pics of crime scenes or photos of other things they respond to; priests should not discuss who confessed what...just because facebook exists doesn't mean traditional forms of confidentiality go out the window...
Reply
Sunday 25 January
By nrankin153@aol.com
Nurses, and Doctors can post surgical pictures as long as a patient can not be identified. In other words if there is a reason for educational purposes for a picture to be posted it can, however due to hippa laws and patient confidentiality a patient or procedure can not be revealed.
Friday 23 January
By Lucky
As it is i have a right to NO Privacy at work then why should my employer have any right to my private life. Employers have no right to keep tabs on employees after hours........
private means private. if i choose to do anything after work its my life not for my employer to look me up on face book or myspace to see who or what i am doing after work.
What has this Country come to?
dont we the people have rights........
Reply
Friday 23 January
By fasthd2
private is not so private!!!! if your a cop, that means on or off duty your still on duty. if your a cop or even a white collar person you should not displaying yourself in that manner!!!!
Reply
Friday 23 January
By savage6662002
It's just another way we pay for the freedom we never had to begin with. Whats private anymore, Bush tapped Americas phones for 2 years. Fine with him why not everyone else jump on the band wagon and start.
And this is just another form of control. It all comes down to who has it and who don't.
Wrong yes. Fair no, but thats life.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By chris_b
Yep once it's on the web nyone can and does read it. If you aare socail networkig on a work computer you could sson find yourself fired. Too many out there needing jobs to put up with that as an employer. If you don't think they are watching think again.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By Greg
They can see mine if I can see theirs.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By rusty
come on folks in the up coming new police state of america it wont matter if you scream from the rooftops that you want your privacy for get it.everybody thought it was ok to give up our liberty & freedoms for that feeling of security,so sit back and take it all in.right now they monitor what ever you typ on any comments and that would be called data mining.any key word spoken more then 3 times in a conversation on the phone triggers tapping.
any kind of protesting anyone does is logged.
so enjoy!!!!its not a conspiracy its a fact
keep all comments recorded so nothing is twisted
Reply
Friday 23 January
By MrT
The question was, "Should employers be able to require that you show them your private social networking pages?" I have to say NO! While it is true if you put it on those sites there is no privacy. But for them to make you show them is just a witch hunt. If they do a search and find it that is something else. As long as anything you put on there is legal then what should it matter anyway.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By DoctorBob
Since all these Nobama voters wanted "change," they're going to get change. Ever heard of the KGB? That's what Nobama has proposed with this national security force he wants to create that would be better funded and more powerful than the U.S. Military. He wants an American KGB. Time to go into defensive mode against Big Brother and his all-pervasive snooping. You have been warned.
Reply
Saturday 24 January
By TennMom
Better check history, Bob. It was G.W. Bush who opened the floodgates which allow the government and our employers to spy on us. You bought into the whole "none but the terrorists or their supporters would have their telephone and Internet communications spied upon" didn't you? The Bush administration came closer to KGB tactics than any administration in recent history. When you have any evidence of President Obama doing the same, make sure you get back to us with it.
Friday 23 January
By cruz
put it on the web, it is there forever, for everyone to read, get a clue people
Reply
Friday 23 January
By H. Parker
I can't speak for policemen and firemen, or other companies, but I know that if you are military you are a soldier 24/7/365.
Reply
Friday 23 January
By bigbrowatchedme
I think what you do on your personal time is your own business as long as it doesnt jeopardize a company or puts someone in harms way. I work for the local government and our Director had me log into my private email, which to me was a violation of my rights. I should sue the asshole
Reply
Friday 23 January
By Peacemkr40
the issue here is whether people can be identified with an association to a company, group or specific job. In this case, the social networking site displayed that they were indeed police officers.
What others have said about does an employer have the right to check up on employees, they can see whether a person's semi-private myspace or facebook page reflects poorly on the company. To post comments or images that are on a public site that are in conflict with the character or image of the company or illistrates a representative of the company in a bad light shouldn't be seen as acceptable. if you want to badmouth the people paying your paycheck, they should have the right to stop paying it.
Reply