We knew marijuana had the ability to impair male fertility -- making it harder for heavy tokers to get their swimmers moving. Now it seems there's another serious risk for stoners to consider.Scientists have found that heavy pot smoking can double a guy's risk of testicular cancer. The disease is currently on the rise in Western countries, and researchers link it to an uptick in people smoking dope. The study looked at the habits of 369 men with testicular cancer and compared them to guys who didn't have the disease. Chances of contracting the disease were particularly increased when smokers started hitting the pipe before the age of 18.
The testes are among the parts of the body with receptors for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) -- the psychoactive ingredient in pot -- and they also produce a cannabis-like chemical that scientists think protects against cancer. The theory is that if you smoke too much pot, it interferes with your body's natural ability to protect against the disease.
In related news, the next Cheech and Chong movie will be a heart-wrenching melodrama about the power of male friendship in the face of overwhelming odds.
Network: 


































Comments:
Add a comment
Tuesday 10 February
By Taylor
I have a hard time believing a study such as this, as interesting as it may be. It seems like they're jumping the gun. Testicular cancer is found mostly in individuals from the age of 18 to 30 years. Isn't that the largest demographic for Cannabis use? This just seems like the medical community trying to find the slightest strand of evidence to demonize pot again. I found this and thought I would share.
From BBC news Health section headline -
- BBC NEWS | Health
""A spokesman for Cancer Research UK said that no previous studies had found a link between marijuana and the disease.""
"Henry Scowcroft, from Cancer Research UK, said: "As the researchers themselves point out, this is the first inkling that there is any association between chronic marijuana use and testicular cancer. "But the researchers only interviewed a relatively small number of men.
"So before we can reach any firm conclusions about whether this is a cause-and-effect relationship, rather than a statistical blip, the result needs to be replicated in a much larger study.""
Reply