Riding the subway can be a pretty grim experience, especially in the summer months when the heat and the smells associated with rising temperatures attack the senses of wary commuters.But travelers on New York City's L Train were surely distracted from all that unpleasantness when a completely nude 19-year-old actress entered their subway car and started pole dancing and posing suggestively.
It wasn't the first flash of skin that city straphangers have had this month -- just two weeks ago, some activist women went topless on the A train to raise awareness of breasts (or something like that).
The latest installation was the brainchild of photographer Zach Hyman, whose current project is taking pictures of nude New Yorkers in public settings.
So how does the public react to being used as an unknowing prop in Hyman's art? Well, it depends entirely on the model's sex. "People see a naked woman and they smile," Hyman explained. "They see a penis and they freak out."
Words both genders should always remember.
La Carmina: Steampunk in Japan: Tokyo Subculture Style (PHOTOS)


























Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl







Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 20 August
By jbjg24m
wish that i had ben on that train!
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By melinda
come on. what about kids. everyone forgets about the kids and their innocents. if people are going to do this, then do it in places where only adults are going to be. and for being freak out to see a mans parts. well women parts are (shoved) in our faces so much that its odd to see a man. and when a man is shown. he usally uggly than sin.
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By chalexiskate2424
I completely agree. As the mommy to a 3 year old daughter, I would not want to be forced to explain the carnal facts before "I" determine that it is time. I would not appreciate this "artist" forcing the issue for me.
Thursday 20 August
By serge
yes wont someone pleeease think of the children...shut up. what kids ride an underground train and what kinda mom would take her kids on a mode of transportation that smells like urine? maybe you would but not my wife!
Thursday 20 August
By Lita
Oh, Melinda. You should be more concerned about your children's education. You have difficulty expressing yourself in writing (the word is innocence, dear, not innocents, for example). Your posting is riddle with so many misspellings it is sad. And then you betray yourself by talking about men's parts (or mans parts, as you put it), seeming to be offended only because the men who expose themselves in public are usually not up to your standards of attractiveness. Wow.
Thursday 20 August
By helema alkaabi
lita ever stop to think mabey english is not her first language? or that she might have a disorder that makes words look right to her but jumbled or misspelled to others? also mr "not my wife!" your prolly rich as sin and able to buy two vehicles! there are thiose that afford even a hooptie!! also ita not just the kids but what if a nun or orthodoxed jewiss or muslim lady were on there? or even an ultra conservative christian woman? no one ever thinks of that!
Thursday 20 August
By Brian Sinclair
Helima, if this is not your 1st language you should learn it. Your paragraph is also riddled with misspelled words and it is disgusting to me. Just shows your too stupid to learn English.
Thursday 20 August
By dave
My favorite thing about these boards is when people make spelling or grammitical errors while ridiculing others for spelling and grammatical mistakes. Brian, it would be "you're too stupid" not "your too stupid".
Thursday 20 August
By twb204
in america you gonna play the innocent kid card. that's just downright offensive and vulgar. kids innocence escaped ages ago out the arse end of the good ole' usa's moral fiber. of course thanks for the laugh, cause that must be the effect you are going for.
Thursday 20 August
By Pasdequoi
Playing spelling police is a waste of time...pay attention to her ideas. Mr. Brian Sinclair, get your head out of your sphincter. 'Disgusting' is a strong word for such a situation. Save that word for a U.S. health care system that is ranked lower than Columbia's. So sick of the elitist spelling police on this board.
Friday 21 August
By Sam
You've gotta be s**tting me... in an age where kids of 'any' years can very easily get access to women doing far more grotesque acts than even regular sex you're lecturing us about kids seeing a simple naked woman on a subway..? Wake up lady
Thursday 20 August
By Jolly
Oh gosh! i'm telling you the end of the world is near!.. crazier things are happening everyday. smh.
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By Nick Skala
um wtf? there could have been children on that train. ever hear of public indecency? they should be in jail.
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By libspeakin
Sorry, saw this same thing in an episode of CSI:New York this season.
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By Tony
I had to laugh at Melinda post about the naked woman. Shes so concern about children seeing this broad.
What is the big deal?? Makes no ddifference to the kid seeing a naked man or woman. A teenage boy will use any con he can to get a girls panites off and any teenaage girl if she thinks shes in love won't be able to wait too service her boyfriend.
I bet Melinda with her hang ups must be real exciting in bed. Grow up...
Reply
Thursday 20 August
By Jon
The big deal is that it is inappropriate for the public eye. There are some guys out there that have morals...you're the one that needs to grow up.
Thursday 20 August
By rhino45411
We are a nation that screams and giggles when we see "pee pee" parts. Believe me... None of this would happen if we weren't so damn up tight with our bodies to begin with. The public eye? That 19 year old did every guy and some girls there a favor... A new image to masterbate to! Ohhh I know! I am a horrible influence! I said masterbate!
Thursday 20 August
By Candcathly
You're the one who should grow up. Sleezeball.
Thursday 20 August
By simplymichelle
Tony, I'm a teenage girl, 15 to be exact and I wouldn't do anything to see my bf take his boxers off or whatever you're talking about. You should grow up because I actually think I'm more mature than you and just so you know, people want to take the subway to get places and have a nice, peaceful ride. If anybody wants to see that than they should go to a club or on their computers but that's not what the subway's for. The subway's for transportation and that only and that's the problem.
Thursday 20 August
By Don
WHat is the story withy NOT showing a man's PENIS in public ads or on TV. They do it in England and Germany. I was at a Family water park some years ago and saw a whole family strip and when the girls only put on their swim suits
bottom, The Males, an older boy and a Man were standing around, and finally put on their trunks. There was no riot, people just looked with interest. I enjoyed the show, since we rarely see such a thing. I am a grown adult.
Reply