WJLA, an ABC affiliate in Washington, D.C., is courting controversy with a four-part news story on breast cancer. In one of the segments, an attractive 28-year-old is led though a self-exam for breast cancer, during which her completely exposed and unpixelated breasts get a lot more camera time than Janet Jackson's ever did during her notorious wardrobe malfunction.Further complicating what they claim is a worthy public service is the station's choice to run the series during sweeps month. "People will say we're doing it just for ratings," said WJLA's general manager Bill Lord. "But we're a commercial television station -- we're trying to get people to watch us. Yes, this is an attention-getting story, but it's also an important story."
Because we're such fans of breasts, and keeping them as healthy as possible, this is a ratings ploy we can get behind. But we can also see how this combination of skin, commerce and a deadly-serious disease would make some people uncomfortable. Where do you stand? (Click here to see the video.)



























Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 30 October
By Takahashi
After watching it I just sat to myself and said, "Wow."
It's amazing how sensitive we are as a society (this is not always a bad thing). However, for things like this I wonder. For documentaries it's okay to show full adult nudity, but why? Because they are of what we deem as an "exotic" culture? I see no difference, both types of exposure where informative, and such exposure is not of any negative intention. This is something that is talked about in Women's Studies: the taboos of our culture.
This is not hard core pornography, and it's not degrading morals and women. It's simply informing the masses about a type of cancer that faces many women.
All in all, I'm kind of glad it's getting this much publicity. After all, sometimes the worst publicity is the best, and this video is now being watched my a lot more people then those tuned into this local news station.
Huzzah!
Reply
Friday 30 October
By Brendan
I live in the Baltimore/Washington area, and the commercial for this program said something along the lines of,
"It's quite controvesial, but it is extremely necessary."
Reply
Friday 30 October
By swimtedswim
25,000 die from prostrate cancer a year. Any bets when that special will air?
maybe on LOGO?
Reply
Friday 30 October
By comeonbbzhang
@@My friend recommended me a very interesting place *** R i ch Chat S. c om *** It's where wealthy singles looking for someone to enjoy their wealthy lifestyle with.
Reply
Saturday 31 October
By Jeremy
Boobs on American TV. Gimme more!
Reply
Sunday 01 November
By northerner
Watched the video. Very tastefully done. Not erotic at all. Yes she is a lovely woman and her breasts were nice to look at. I'm not dead. It was simply a clinical-approach vid. It was easy to understand the reason her breasts were exposed. Not for sensation but for life-saving information. The "juvenile" in the audience will, of course, go stupid and obscene, immediately exposing their immaturity. Comes with the territory. If it saves one woman's life, the applause and credit goes to Lauren Albright for her courage and bravery. She realized it's not about her or baring her breasts in public. It's about saving lives. Critics need to chill, big time.
Reply
Monday 02 November
By Wholesale Brand clothing
I live in the Baltimore/Washington area, and the commercial for this program said something along the lines of,
"It's quite controvesial, but it is extremely necessary."
Reply
Monday 02 November
By huck
Would it be as controversial if it was an old lady? Doubtful.
Reply