It's the one-year mark, the anniversary of the election we are told was the most important one ever. (Well come on, they always exaggerate the night before.) But now that we're in the bright light of day, a quick review of events is in order.
Phase One:
Ahh, January. Literally hundreds of millions of hopebaggers descended upon the National Mall and nearby tunnels to watch each other listen to small radios and TVs broadcasting the inauguration taking place somewhere close. When night fell, and the excitement of our national moment had passed, mobs of the lost wandered in the barren dark, surrounded by endless piles of garbage and miles of fences preventing progress. Life has such an ironic sense of humor, doesn't it? To kick off his new administration, post-partisan Prez extraordinaire adopted the first of many message strategies. We're sure this will bring back fond memories:

Phase Two:
Happy times, phase two, happy times. Democrats were feeling the power of power. This was the moment when the rise of the oceans would reverse. Change had come to America. Time for a new tone. Respectful. Friendly. Not too fat. Which is why in the spring the administration rolled out their second major message push:

Phase Three:
In phase three, the administration knew it was time to get cracking overseas. There were images to repair, cowboys to make fun of, and DVD collections to be delivered. This was no time for unpreparedness, and President Obama was up to the task. In a whirlwind tour, the president apologized to the world for America's audacity and incorrect wall plug configurations. The stunning array of apologies, for everything from unilateralism to loud music, was part of the next big message push:

Phase Four:
Autumn. The smell of burning wood, the fiercely colored trees, the swiftly falling leaves and approval ratings. Can't you just smell it? The Obama administration could. With the health-care plan foundering, town halls raucous, and tea parties nationwide, the president needed to change the message. They called on Snark Czar Anita Dunn and came up with a plan. The War on Terror was now an "Overseas Contingency Operation", freeing up the "wars on things" concept for a much more entertaining endeavor: war on Fox News! Alas, the best laid plans of mice and Anita Dunn can sometimes fail, and the war became nothing but a quagmire of:

Phase Five:
So now here we are. It's the one-year mark. And after all the peace prizes, Olympic snafus, pirate glory-hounding, more rounds of golf than Tiger, and an SNL-enshrined list of unfulfilled promises, we are left to wonder where we are, how we got here, why we are wearing different pants, and what was in that blue pill anyway.
But it hasn't been haphazard.
No, you see, though the message has changed many times, the core has remained the same. The most important thing to President Obama. Those two little letters that all the other messages were built on. Because in the end, for President Obama, it's really all about:

Network: 


































Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 05 November
By William W. Wexler
Is this supposed to be humorous or deep? It's neither.
You missed the mark by parroting the right wing media. Real conservatives like Bill Buckley used to be intelligent, witty and charming. Your bottom-feeding, conspiracy-theory-spinning, crackpot demented parrots who channel Cleon Skousen, Father Coughlin, and Carl McIntyre are none of the above.
You seem to be saying by parodying the negative that Bush is without blame. Are you an American who read the Constitution? WTF is wrong with you if you don't understand the state of the government that Bush left behind? The Bush Administration acted as a government within a government, starting illegal wars, trashing the Constitution, torturing, spying on Americans, all while claiming to be a "war president". Well, we still got the wars, the illegal spying, Gitmo, and Executive Branch overreach. Are you HAPPY about that?
Blame Rush? Are you nuts? He's a MEDIA COMEDIAN, he has nothing to do with government (except that GOP leaders have to kiss his ring and even THAT isn't working so good for them, LOL.) Obama never blamed Rush for anything. He doesn't care what Rush says, there's no reason why he should.
The effort that Obama made to patch up the damage overseas done by Bush's unilateralist foreign policy approach would never please any righty. That's because you can't UNDERSTAND it, you never shared your toys when you were a kid and you were the neighborhood bully. However, when Bush broke the law by invading Iraq, people in the world took notice that the US was an actual threat to them rather than a boogyman threat like "terrissts". That's why the US ranked high on the list of rogue states in an international poll taken by Pew in 2005. So trying to fix that is "blaming America"? No, it's repudiating the illegal actions of a President who should be impeached, convicted, and imprisoned for war crimes.
I don't know what you mean by "Lame BS". If you ask the normal person on the street, 3 out of 4 will tell you that they agree with Anita Dunn's assessment of Faux News. If you mean they're LAME BS I'll agree with you, as I have made one of their shock jocks the subject of one of my blogs, www.glennbeckreport.com. Yeah, that's lame BS, Glenn Beck and the 9/12 Project. 2/3 of the people that watch Beck don't even know he's the member of a religious cult. I'm trying to fix that.
I know Obama is an easy target for the accusation of "egotist" from people who are so intellectually inferior to him that they couldn't hold up their end of an argument with Obama with a crutch. I've never met the guy, and although I worked on his campaign I didn't vote for him because he seemed to me to be too interested in negotiating with terrorists. I mean domestic terrorists, like people who show up to town hall meetings with photoshopped pictures of Obama/Hitler, packing heat, all full of steam but no facts. See, you people LOST the election. We WON. So despite your protests, your lame-ass commentary, your never-ending conspiracy theories, your hate/threat tactics, we still got both Houses of Congress and the Executive Branch. So yeah, Obama is better than you, he's a black guy who overcame racial profiling by a whole passel of ignoramuses just like you and was WILLING to take the hardest job in the world, namely
CLEANUP AFTER 8 YEARS OF BUSH.
-Wexler
Reply
Thursday 05 November
By Blago Bloggo
There is a meta-joke about Obama jokes that goes something like this.
Q: What's the main problem with Barack Obama jokes?
A: His followers don't think they're funny and everyone else doesn't think they're jokes.
Wexler here obviously needs to lay off the Kool-Aid. He is to funny what anti-matter is to matter. And the irony that he likens conservatives to the socialist priest and crank Coughlin shows the depth of his ignorance of history, the law, and truth itself.
Hey Wexler, when you can find at least one joke here to laugh at you will have made the first step back from the edge of Kool-Aid-ville.
Thursday 05 November
By William W. Wexler
Blago...
The meta joke is true.
I guess I haven't had any Kool-Aid since I was a kid 50 years ago. But I have been watching the political scene for many of those years and believe it or not I have a wonderful sense of humor. People on Twitter compliment me on a regular basis about it.
However, you, on the other hand, are just a bit out of touch with reality if you call Father Coughlin a "socialist". If that's the best example you can come up with of irony about how I'm out of touch with the truth, I'd say you need to crack a book once in a while and dig a little deeper in the well. Self-proclaimed "conservatives" are not only LIKE Coughlin, he was one of them. I never claimed to be a legal expert, but I can read and people whose opinions I respect a lot more than yours think that GWB and company ought to be behind bars. Personally, I don't care what you think about it so don't bother responding to this point. Or this post for that matter.
Don't take my criticism of your crummy, phony satire too seriously, because you're taking yourself too seriously.
That's not Kool-Aid, that's just good advice.
-Wexler
Reply
Thursday 05 November
By JadedByPolitics
WOW you are quite the cry baby are you not? This is humor with a ton of realism included. I suspect YOU LIE when you say people compliment your humor because your face is stuck so far up The Won's ASS as to make you non existent!
Thursday 05 November
By JadedByPolitics
Dude, you NAILED that narcissistic layabout! GREAT JOB!
Reply
Friday 06 November
By brewers_rule
Gee Wexler, you think you could've elaborated a bit more on your points? It only took me 10min. to move down past your hour-long soliloquoy of insults to get a comment in. It's nice to see you're not partisan at all in your thesis of how conservatives are to blame for everything. Perhaps you could further enlighten us all?
Other than not stopping the Community Reinvestment Act which was started by Clinton and defended vehemently by Democrats to this DAY, could you list some actual policies that Bush enacted to cause the financial mess that started w/the mortgage meltdown other than his drunken spending on liberal policies the left still claimed he didn't do enough for? I mean, besides spewing the same spy theories, illegal wars, etc. liberal talking points you're blaming Caleb Howe for perhaps?
I suppose also that Obama declaring war on FoxNews or villifying private citizens attending the tea parties and supporting their condemnation is NOT a violation of the Constitution and free speech or wrong? Nor is the Executive Branch overreaching when Obama villifies the energy, banking, mortgage, and health care industries so he can justify gaining financial control over them either, right? Nor strong-arming those companies w/gag orders on Humana or slapping pay limits on private organizations? Or perhaps you'd rather explain how the domestic spy program is still in existence today despite your claims it should be ended? Or perhaps the reason Gitmo is still open, we're still in Iraq, and Afghanistan is now failing? It's good to know liberals have proper, non-insulting, nor attacking, rational individuals as yourself backing them while these things are going on in Washington right now that definitely are NOT trampling the Constitution in any way, nor eroding what makes America so unique and full of freedom.
But one thing's for certain, regardless of what your evidence is: if you think the tea partiers are just a fad, that this is NOT a major red light for liberals in 2010 and 2012, I pity you and your party. When the wave of sweeping elections arrive to erase the hardcore liberal Democratic Party from power for a LONG time, I hope you'll remember how insignificant and foolish all those conservative voters are that end this nonsense. One can only hope that hardcore liberals such as yourself finally put their money where their mouths have been for the last 8 years and move to Canada or France when that happens because if you stay, you're only going to grow more angry at your policies being reversed completely by true Americans.
Reply
Saturday 07 November
By BB
As a person who will probabaly vote for Obama a 2nd time I applaude all critisizms of Obama. He is breaking all his promises and not rolling back the police state that was put in place even though it is not being used much. Yea Obama is better than what the republicans would throw at us but lets critisize him till he strightens out. The medical plan is especially bad because it will force you to purchase it no matter how much they raise the prices so they will raise them as often as possible. Single payer would be great but this is just more greed. So go ahead conservaitves critisize every part of govenrment that does not work and that does not listen to te people. I am a liberal but if your critisizms cause examinations of policy they are a good thing. I will never vote conservative but I am in favor of critizing whoever is in power bowing to the K street money people. Republicans are worse for scandals and taking money from the corporates but we must watch both sides and try to stop any corruption.
Reply