New research found no evidence of an erogenous zone in the female vagina.Despite 56 percent of women reporting having a so-called "G-spot," a King's College London study of identical twins between 23 and 82 says it may only be a figment of a woman's imagination, encouraged by popular culture and sex therapists, rather than , er, hard science.
When comparing pairs of twin sisters, scientists found that genetically identical pairs both reported having G-spots with the same frequency as fraternal ones. (If the sought-after erogenous zone is for real, identical twins -- who share 100 percent of their genes -- should both report having one much more often than non-identical twins.)
Sexologist Beverly Whipple, who popularized the term "G-spot" in the early '80s, disagrees with these findings. She attacks the new study's methodology for, among other things, not finding identical twins who have both slept with the same man. (Thus, it's not that the zone is missing, necessarily, she says, but men who can't find or properly stimulate it.)
Although one has to figure a guy who's bagged twins and lived to tell about it should have the skills to find any G-spot, real or imagined.


























Madonna Super Bowl Halftime Show: Romans, Cheerleaders and MIA's Middle Finger
Why Your 2012 Tax Bill May Jump By $8,000
Savings Experiment: Tissues vs. Toilet Paper
Hiroshi Ishiguro's android mannequin creeps out Japanese shoppers (video)
Boss Indifferent To My Suicidal Impulse, Says Stock Trader Who Lost Millions
Randy Travis Apologizes for Public Intoxication
Dozens Of D.C. Workers May Lose Jobs Over Alleged Unemployment Fraud
Wrecks to Riches: Hunting Sunken Treasures from Cape Cod to the Costa Concordia
Kenneth Robinson, $16 Squatter, Kicked Out of Upscale Home
Super Bowl Halftime Bloopers: 10 Huge Mistakes on the Big Stage







Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 07 January
By Jaci
this is ridiculous, the g-spot exists, this is just another excuse for a guy not able to give a girl an orgasm. The G-spot is about 2 inches into the vagina, on the wall toward the front of the woman, if massaged it can create an intense orgasm from just that.
Try it.
Reply
Monday 04 January
By sexy
Lol I agree, what BS. One reason this study is flawed is as it is stated in the article; the twins did not sleep with the same men. Obviously different men have a different skill levels in the ability to stimulate areas including the G-spot. Also, if you look at the sample they used, it was 1800 British women. This certainly does not represent the entire population of women. I look at this is a weak attempt to further suppress women's sexuality in our society.
Monday 04 January
By dylan
I don't see why a man would need an excuse, if he can't bring a woman to orgasm, a man is not "to blame", orgasms by man or a woman are a nice bonus, not an inalienable right, hmmph!
Tuesday 05 January
By sexy
No one said it was an "inalienable right". No worries dylan, someday you will gain enough experience to bring a woman to orgasm :)
Tuesday 26 January
By HeyAlderbury
no
Monday 04 January
By cowslinger64
It absolutely does exist. I've brought women to the most powerful orgasms of their life knowing how to stroke it. Having them unable to move for a minute or more, is one of the hottest things in sex.
I have noticed, at least in my experience, that the shorter more petite women have smaller gspots than taller women. Not sure if that holds true for all women, but has been that way with women I've been with.
Reply
Monday 04 January
By Big T
I couldn't find it with google maps. :(
Reply
Tuesday 05 January
By Beth
Wow, so sad that women still have to prove to other people what happens in their own bodies. Men know the difference between coughing and spitting, right? Well, women know the difference between vaginal and clitoral orgasms. We're not idiots.
Reply
Tuesday 05 January
By Sweed
of course the g-spot can seem nonexistent if the man isn't big enough to reach it...
Reply
Wednesday 13 January
By Sharon
Since when do you need a man to find your G-spot? Proper studies of the G-spot should just cut out the middle man entirely. For the 44% of women who say they can't find it... buy yourselves a vibe and some bubble bath and do some fishing.
It may take a few tries but once you've got it... you'll gladly rescind your naysayers vote.
Reply
Friday 15 January
By LLOYD
In the research, 1,804 British women aged 23-83 answered questionnaires. All were pairs of identical or non-identical twins. Identical twins share all their genes, while non-identical pairs share 50 percent of theirs. If one identical twin reported having a G-spot, this would make it far more likely that her sister would give the same answer. But no such pattern emerged, suggesting the G-spot is a matter of the woman’s subjective opinion.
http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2236872
Reply
Sunday 15 August
By Max Power
Hilarious. So the G-Spot is the new Evolution, is that it?
Here's some interesting trick I pulled out of an old 1960-ish French "erotic techniques" book I stumbled upon back when I was 17 yrs old:
Take a regular marble. Put it in the middle of your palm. With only the tip of your middle finger, roll the marble around in your palm. Practice until you have some amount of dexterity.
Now get with a girl, place your hand between her legs, resting put your middle finger inside her, curl it toward your palm (ie. her upper wall) and repeat the exact movement you've practice with the marble.
Unless you have very tiny kid's hands, 9 times out of 10 you'll be able to find her G-Spot. The unlucky 1 time left can be due to various different reasons, but certainly NOT THE NON-EXISTENCE of the G-Spot!
Reply