As the NFL playoffs kick off, the odds are good that at least a few of the pros fighting for a ticket to the big dance this weekend are gay. Don't believe us? Let's do the math: 4 percent of the U.S. population is gay. There are 53 men on an NFL roster, and 32 teams in the league. That means, statistically speaking, there'd be roughly 68 gay men in the NFL, or a little over two per team. We've found out about a few gay players after they'd already retired, but to this point no currently active NFL player has been publicly out of the closet. We decided to take a look at what it might take to cause the first gay NFL player to come out (aside from being allegedly outed by someone else, as in the case of fullback Ovie Mughelli), when it might happen, and what it could mean.
What It Might Take
Only three NFL players have come out of the closet -- David Kopay in 1975, Roy Simmons in 1992, and Esera Tuaolo in 2002 -- and they all did it after their playing days were behind them. Howard Bragman, a publicist who specializes in helping gay celebrities and athletes come out of the closet (his former clients include Tuaolo and John Amaechi) tells Asylum that he thinks one of two things would have to happen before we see a current player come out.
"Either it'll have to be someone who's caught in a situation where they have to decide if they want the news to hit the tabloids, or if they want to come out on their own terms," Bragman says, "Or it'll be someone who was out before their career started -- some college player who's so good, it doesn't matter."
Are those circumstances due to the locker room homophobia exemplified by the likes of Larry Johnson? Kind of, explains Bragman: "I don't think a current player is going to come out and risk life and limb -- you can get killed out there, if some immature idiot takes a cheap shot -- without some sort of extenuating circumstances."
Furthermore, he says teammates might take it as a reason to be offended under other pretenses: "You'd hear guys complaining -- 'Oh, he wasn't honest with me!' -- but it's a workplace issue. They'd have the right to come out or not."
When It Might Happen
In 2000, Brian Sims was a defensive tackle for Division II NCAA school Bloomberg University, and a team captain. He was also openly gay, perhaps the first college football captain who was. While coming from a small school and being undersized for a tackle -- Sims was 6 feet tall, 240 lbs. -- he didn't have the opportunity to enter the NFL. He told us he thinks that the first out NFL player is playing right now, either at the high school or college level.
"It'll be someone in a skill position -- either a quarterback, a running back, a wide receiver, or maybe a middle linebacker. It'll be someone who's playing at a big-name school, and he'll be openly gay while he's in college," Sims tells Asylum. "There's probably not someone like that currently playing in the NCAA. I'd probably be the person who'd know, and I'm not aware of anyone right now."
But time, Sims stresses, is definitely on the side of it happening sooner, rather than later. "The fact is," he says, "the NFL is comprised mostly of people under the age of 40, and people in that age group, statistically speaking, skew heavily progressive on gay rights issues. Something like 80 percent of young people are progressive there. But if you ask them how they think other people in their age group feel, they only think that about a third of their peers share their belief."
A gay NFL star could help alter the second statistic quickly.
What It Might Mean
"When our coach wanted to motivate us," Sims says, "The thing he'd say to get us to focus on an opposing player was to tell us that, 'This guy's a racist. He said some racist stuff last week.' And we'd go out there looking to stop him." He expects the same thing would happen once the locker room rallied around their gay teammate: "A guy like Larry Johnson would be more of a target."
But would those teammates rally? Sterling Sharpe told HBO's "Real Sports" that if Tuaolo had come out when they played together in Green Bay, "He would have been eaten alive and he would have been hated for it ... He'd have never gotten to the game on Sunday."
Interestingly, however, Sims references another Packers icon when rebutting Sharpe's point: "Vince Lombardi had an older brother who was gay, and he said that he felt that a gay player would have an incredibly strong sense of character. Anyone who had the courage to go through what an out gay player would have to would be an incredibly positive influence on his team."
Bragman agrees that teammates would be likely to back up the player: "I think they'd be shockingly supportive. Of course, other teams and players might not," he's quick to say. He also dismisses the talk of players being uncomfortable showering with a gay teammate. "There's nothing less sexual than an NFL locker room," he insists.
And ultimately, Sims believes that it would come down to a matter of leadership: "When Jackie Robinson joined the Dodgers, Leo Durocher, the manager, stood up for him. The coach is the leader of the team, and players take their cue from him. If the coach says, 'I've recruited a player who's going to help us win,' that'll be important."
Finally, both Bragman and Sims agree that the impact of this first gay player, in terms of the way gay men are perceived, would be immeasurable. The player may become an icon, but Sims says, "How his team responds will further LGBT rights more than anything. The best part would be his teammates. You'd have 50 big athletes, people that kids look up to, saying, 'So what?' They'd have a bigger voice."
That leaves us with one final question: How would the fans react? What would you do if a player whose jersey you owned came out of the closet?


























'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Baby Fox Asks for Help
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work
Lost Dog Found 500 Miles Away







Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 08 January
By Dan Solomon
Well, Chad Ochocinco did just come out and explain that he was in good shape to play because he had sex with a woman this week, so some of them are coming out as straight.
But if we're using Leviticus to judge whether or not we've got a truly holy league, then only players with righteous neckbeards are likely to pass muster -- the book also says, "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." Either every player except for Kyle Orton is damned, or we can take Leviticus with a grain of salt.
--d
Reply
Friday 08 January
By gaz
Hey tam, how are ya? Good to see ya. Just got a memo from The Internet for ya: it says 'Nobody wants you here'. K have a nice day now!
Reply
Friday 08 January
By Bea Arthur
Unless you speak Aramaic or Koine Greek, you can't really "quote" the Bible. Also, Henry VIII was a big fan of Leviticus. He also undermined the Catholic church and LOVED to bang.
Also, I think baseball will be the sport to break open the doors for pro athletes to be publicly open about who they are.
Reply
Saturday 09 January
By Mcpogi
This from a screen name taken from a 6'2" lezbo whp probably COULD have played in the NFL...
Friday 08 January
By Observer
Using percentages to determine how man gay people could be in the NFL is kinda stupid. Using these same percentages we would probably underestimate the number of homosexuals working on Broadway. I think guys who are homosexual would naturally steer away from activities where being gay can put them in very uncomfortable situations with their peers. I am sure there may be some homosexuals but I don;t think it matches the proportions that homosexuality occurs in the general population.
If you are going to use leviticus then all you christians need to stop eating pork right now since leviticus 11:7 forbids it. Seriously the bible is full of inconsistencies.
Reply
Friday 08 January
By Dan Solomon
I don't think it's easy to know, honestly - I wouldn't use that statistic as, like, hard evidence that there are two and a half gay guys in every NFL locker room, but I'm also not convinced that "football player" is a designation that gay men are more likely to opt out of than straight men.
--d
Saturday 09 January
By Biker
Lev. 11:6-8 that "touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean," but may I still play football if I wear gloves?..it is called a pig skin ya know!
Saturday 09 January
By Candice
When God judges you It will be to late for you to repent.
Friday 08 January
By Richard
Or, if you use a sample size of something like oh I don't know 42,400. 4% of that is 1696 (53*32). So out of 42,400 people that makes 1,696 of them gay. That leave 40,704 heterosexuals. Who is to say that the entire population of NFL players, 1696 in this example, doesn't fit into that group of 40,704?
Reply
Friday 08 January
By Dan Solomon
That's technically possible, sure, but unlikely. Consider this: If you roll a die 6,000 times, 5,000 of those times, it's not going to come up "4". But if you were to watch someone roll that die a thousand times, the odds are still pretty good that, at least some of the time, you'd see four dots roll over.
--d
Friday 08 January
By jason
Most men are bisexual in orientation. Alfred Kinsey found this in his extensive studies. Many men won't admit it because the male-male interaction is stigmatized by social factors.
It's important that you stop polarizing male sexuality into gay and straight. In between, where most men exist, there's bisexuality.
Reply
Saturday 09 January
By dan
Most men are not bisexual, our "equipment" dictates to us which sex we CAN have sex with and by and large it only works with one sex. Behaviour shrinks say all kinds of things about social behaviour that has nothing to so with sex. Psuedointellectualism is one of the lamest of pursuits.
Saturday 09 January
By Michael P
Gee, Dan... are you saying that heterosexual men are incapable of having anal sex with women? Is that really what you just said?
Pathetic.
Tuesday 12 January
By Tom
Jason you are soooooo right on. Being completely gay or completely straight is in the MINORITY. Sexuality is like a Bell shaped curve. Take at look at the site g0ys.org (g zero ys). It comes on a little strong but has a lot of insight, read with an open mind.
Saturday 09 January
By MIKE
PEOPLE who quote from the bible only do so when its conenient to their views. THE BIBLE also states , women who are not virgins on their wedding day should be STONED TO DEATH. Okay ladies ,start lining up!
Reply
Saturday 09 January
By Brenda
Don't care as long as they can play football ...
Reply
Sunday 10 January
By Kayla
Thank you! geez..
I was waiting for someone to post that..
Wednesday 20 January
By robert
It wouldn't work, too many wide receivers, not enough tight ends!
Saturday 09 January
By Kalik
I can't believe that being gay is such an issue in 2010.
I'm a religious person and yes I'm gay, but guess what? Someone will make issue of me being gay telling me that it's in The Bible, but I don't hear they making it an issue when a husband/wife commit adultery against their wife/husband? I don't hear people make a big deal when someone steal, kill etc.
I follow the 10 commandments and it does not say anything about being gay etc.
I guess fathers should marry their dauthers, cousin or even sisters, as it's in the Bible that it was common in those days.
And for all those people who have a problem with other folks being gay, I say that you should not buy clothing from Calvin Klein, Versace or let's even make it better, don't have a guy gay who is open to put makeup on your wife and please don't be served on a flight by a gay male flight attendant.
Why would someone who is gay come out today? It's because they don't want to be treated or be discriminated by other jerks who hates on someone because they're gay.
There are more important issues facing us today like STRAIGHT pedophiles luring our kids to have sex with them on the internet.
Reply
Saturday 09 January
By Biker
To all of you who do believe that Leviticus is the only and final word on "God's view on homosexuality" ...
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from you on this forum, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? - Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding all of us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Reply