
Traffic pilot Frank Vogt's single-engine Cessna started running rough, and he noticed that the plane's oil pressure was dropping rapidly. He thought for a moment about returning to the airport, but quickly realized he would never make it.
The 28-year-old turned to his passenger, Metro Networks traffic reporter Mike Lankford, and said, "This is really happening."
They were 1,200 feet above New Jersey and it was 6:30 a.m. -- still dark enough that most of the ground looked like what Vogt describes as "black holes." With his engine failing, Vogt glided toward the one place he knew would be properly lit: the New Jersey Turnpike.
Read on to find out what happened and to watch a video interview with Vogt.
"I knew it was wide enough, I knew it was straight enough. There wasn't any wires, and I didn't see many overpasses," Vogt tells Asylum. He reasoned that since the traffic was still light, there would be enough space between the cars that they could slow down and let him in.
His hastily concocted plan worked perfectly. He even managed to pull his Cessna to the side of the road, although the inevitable rubbernecking -- completely justified in this case -- still blocked traffic a mile-and-a-half in both directions.
With his plane out of commission, Vogt will be temporarily unable to help provide traffic reports for Metro Networks. But he looks forward to getting back in the air at least by the summer, when he'll be piloting skydivers.
Maybe he can give them advice on what to do when unexpectedly forced to land in a tight spot.


























The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Visit the Maldive Islands Before It's Too Late
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Springtime Budget-Busters -- Savings Experiment
Is This Woman Too Pretty To Work?
Mariah Carey Suffers Wardrobe Malfunction on Good Morning America
Parents Face Tough Choice When Tornadoes Bear Down
The Story Behind Hairspray







Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 04 February
By Bob
This emergency landing had a happy ending. However, every pilot knows that landing on a freeway is very risky. It easily could have ended in disaster. My pilot instructor told me 30 years ago that we (pilots) do not have the right to endanger innocent freeway drivers because of a forced landing. Had there been a loss of life from a mom driving her children to school, we would have a completely different headline.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Mechelle
I saw this on TV and it did say that at the time of landing, there were NO vehicles in sight on the road. I think he did a great job and he save both their lives, whats wrong with that? I grant you one thing, if it had been you, and your life was in danger, you probably would have done the same thing. When it comes to saving your own life, you will do whatever it takes.
Thursday 04 February
By Bob
Mechelle...just so I understand your post. Your saying that is OK for me to land my twin engine plane on your car and eliminate your family? Is that right?
Thursday 04 February
By Dave
I am a pilot and I know the complete void of topographical information available while flying at night. Landing in a dark area to avoid the freeway could have, and probably would have, been disasterous. The freeway was lighted, and the traffic was light so I think he made the right decision in landing there.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Me
Duh! It's a no brainer!
Thursday 04 February
By Bob
OK..so "light traffic" is safe? No traffic would be safe. His decision was lucky... not right. I agree that landing in the dark is not easy, but killing someone and having to live with that for the rest of your life is not easy either.
Thursday 04 February
By Kevin
So Bob, do us all a favor and go kill yourself in the dark. You're saying that crashing into the unknown in the darkness (possibly an orphanage) is better than a well lit, light traffic road? I'm not familiar with the road, but depending on the speed limit, he should have been rather close to the same speed as any cars on the road, was traveling in the same direction as traffic, and set it down between any cars on the road. Then continued to think of others as he coasted to the side of the road, not just leaving it in the center lane. A good piece of flying. Me? USAF Vet. Flying since 1978.
Thursday 04 February
By Peter
What if it was a F16 ? or perhaps a Commercial Flight ?
FREEWAYS ARE NOT FOR AIRCRAFT unless you LIVE IN SWITZERLAND where most AUTOBAHNS ARE EMERGENCY LANDING / TAKEOFF STRIPS for MILITARY AIR TRAFFIC .
Now Austria has the SWISS BEAT they developed SINGLE ROTOR BLADE HELICOPTERS to be able to HUG ANY MOUNTAIN and LAND ON A NARROW LEDGE !
Thursday 04 February
By basketpam
Does this feat earn his 5 Hogwarts points for "sheer dumb luck?" I'm glad it had a happy ending but this man was taking an awful risk and putting MANY innocent people at risk. I hope this is NOT something they teach at flight school as a common practice when you're in trouble. Not everyone can be this lucky. We've all seen headlines where this has happened and not all the cars were able to avoid the plane. I hope this is the last time he has to try this stunt.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Idunnobut
Taking an awful risk? Putting MANY innocent people in danger? Are you reading the same article? Traffic was light; he didn't put innocents in danger. Give him credit. If it was daylight and the 'pike heavy with traffic, he'd likely have put it in a field or water..
Thursday 04 February
By pete
On a road way or in the bush, the pilot is ALWAYS the first to arrive at the scene of the accident. A lot of car drivers try to do that too, I've often noticed.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Bob
as a former pilot i have put the same thing in my mind a thousand times,The cops will give you a traffic ticket if you do land on a public highway,take it from a past ticket payer ha
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By jimmy
I am a pilot as well and every pilot asks himself the same question...about landing on a roadway...in this situation (given the traffic and time of day), I believe I would have tried to do the same thing he did....one thing you all may not be thinking about...when you decide to go for an interstate during an emergency landing....yu / I would know the risks of a car interfering with your "smooth" landing...on close final I would access the situation and if the roadway was not clear I would steer for the medium strip instead of hitting a vehicle...also I guarantee you there will be hell to pay with the FAA if you do land on a freeway....especially if you hit a car, but many people have died because of the FAA's relentless, harsh punishments and reprecussion's for any infraction.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Gerry
The guy missed everyone on the freeway, so what's all this negative stuff about he "could" have hurt someone. This guy had the ability to make the best of the situation and he did, I'd fly with him just as I would have flown with the pilot who landed on the Hudson River.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By jimmy
Interesting that in the video she reinforce's the "idea" that that was the "only" place to set it down"....that is crap and the FAA knows it....I'd be very surprised if they let him get by with risking "any" live's on that highway....every pilot is told from the time he is a student, that if you lose an engine at night.....head for the darkest area you see so as not to hurt anyone else because you decided to fly...!!! He was lucky to say the least....be interesting to see what the FAA say.....it might not be his decision wheather or not he flys again...(at least until he gets his license back)....the FAA doesn't take kindly to pilots putting the general public at risk...!!
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By jim
Don't get me wrong....I would have done the same thing in that situation....and taken the medium strip if there was a chance of hitting a car....if he had hit a car and killed or crippled someone he would be facing manslaughter charge's and never fly again, legally....so thankfully this turned out ok for him....I'm just saying there may still be reprecussions for his decision to land there.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By kelly
When I was learning to fly,that was one of the places we were told to make an emergency landing.I was also taught how to do it.There are many things to consider..He did it the right way..just for all of you who think he was being careless.It'd be great if you knew what you were talking about!!!!
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Bob
You made my point Gerry. Captain Sullivan landed in the Hudson River risking only himself and the passengers. No one on land had to worry that day because his decision was to not risk other's innocent lives. It was the most selfless thing he could do. He is a true hero.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Ed K
Sorry, Bob you're wrong. You say "Captain Sullivan landed in the Hudson River risking only himself and the passengers." As I understand, his plane barely made it over the George Washington Bridge, and the Hudson River has much water traffic-such as the Circle Line and even the numerous Waterways ferry boats which saved his passengers and crew that criss-cross that river dozens of times a day. I think in BOTH situations, the pilots assessed the condition of their aircraft and the availability of viable landing sites and made the correct decision. They should be commended.
Thursday 04 February
By Ed K
Sorry, Bob the point you make here is wrong. You say "Captain Sullivan landed in the Hudson River risking only himself and the passengers." As I understand, his plane barely made it over the George Washington Bridge. I work along the Hudson River and it has much water traffic-such as the Circle Line, cruise ships, barges and even the numerous Waterways ferry boats which saved his passengers and crew that criss-cross that river dozens of times a day. I think in BOTH situations, the pilots assessed the condition of their aircraft and the availability of viable landing sites and made the correct decision. Likewise, they should both be commended.