LOOK: This Is Not Your Typical Engagement Photo...
And you thought diapers were exclusively for babies and the elderly. P'shaw!As it turns out, there are, indeed, grown-ups who get off at the sight of a hot babe all gussied up in one of those giant, white, crinkly pee-and-poop buckets.
And, honestly, everyone should be so lucky to have such a focused passion. If it means that the sight of -- again -- a giant, white, velcro repository for urine and feces is your thing, more power to ya.
But when this kind of thing goes up on YouTube, it becomes our responsibility to ask: Is it, like, porn? Keep reading to cast your vote.
| Yes. Now if you'll excuse me I have to cry alone. | |
|---|---|
| No ... there's obviously a non-pornographic explanation for this. |
Killed Soldier In London Attack Identified
Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Brave Woman Stood Down Armed London Attackers
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Surgeon's Remove Giant Hairball From Tiger
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
LOOK: Bank Vault Saves 22 Lives During Tornado
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Demi Looks FANTASTIC In A Bikini
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Okla. School Survivor: Teacher 'Saved Our Lives'
PHOTO: Dog Guards Dead Victim's Body After Oklahoma Tornado Disaster
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Helen Flanagan Launches PETA Campaign As Only She Knows How
LOOK: Photoshop Mistake Is Seriously Cringeworthy
Singer Sues McDonald's, Claims Chicken Sandwich Incident Ruined Her Voice
Pope Francis Says All Who Do Good Are Redeemed - Atheists Included
REVEALED: Disturbing Trend In Human Intelligence
Man Reportedly Beheaded In Brutal Assault In London Neighborhood
Wolf Blitzer's Embarrassing Moment With Tornado Survivor
Help For Heroes Killing
PHOTOS: Tornado Aftermath Leaves Trail Of Destruction
White Father Allegedly Suspected Of Kidnapping Biracial Daughters
U.S. Acknowledges Four American Citizens Killed In Drone Strikes
The World's Most Powerful Women
NY Times Eviscerates Obama White House
Mother Dies With Infant During Oklahoma Tornado
WATCH: Tornado Victim Finds Dog During CBS Interview
WATCH: Mom's Emotional Reunion With Son After Tornado
Comments:
Add a comment
Monday 08 February
By northerner
Be careful what you condemn. Everyone has some sort of a fetish about something. Look up the definition for fetish. For some, having a fascination with bodily functions is a fetish. Some guys, like me, have a "fetish" for gorgeous, shapely legs. I assume she continued to remove her diaper to show...um...what she did. To some that's disgusting. To some it might be fascinating. Some never outgrew the fascination with those things and they can be, well, fascinating or arousing. Be careful what you criticize. More than a few would disagree. Is it porn? Depends on your perspective. Beauty, or crud, is in the eye of the beholder. If the girl in the clip gets her kicks out of wearing a Depends, so what? Who is she hurting? Herself? How? So much worse stuff on You Tube and other such sites. And I agree, carrying that fetish to its extremes is totally disgusting. By the way, didn't you guys show a sexy, scantily clad model last year who, as you put it, liked "butt fudge"? Sounds like she may be of the same camp. Her choice. Not yours. Falls under the first amendment. If we don't like it, we don't look at it. Works for me. Just sayin'.
Reply
Saturday 13 February
By The Martins
Northerner, finding long leggged women who wear short skirts and heels to be attractive is hardly a fetish. I'm guessing close to 100% of all heterosexual men find young scantily women with shapely legs to be sexually stimulating.
Being attracted to long legged young women becomes a fetish only when one is rendered incapable of sexual arousal unless ones partner is female, has long shapely legs, is wearing a mini skirt, and stilleto heels as well.
Even then, this isn't on par with the wearing of adult diapers as a means of achieving sexual arousal, with or without excrement or urination.
The former describes a preference the later describes a perversion. In psychological parlance, it is what is known as a paraphilia. People who engage in such practices are understood to be acting in a manner that is harmfull to themselves and their partner(s).
There is nothing uplifting orfulfilling about crapping in a diaper and then having sex. It is demeani9ng, belittling, and debasing.
Friday 19 February
By David
@ The Martins
You're wrong about that. I have a foot fetish but can be completely satisfied sexually without the stimulation of my partner's feet. It's just like a bonus or special treat.
Wednesday 17 November
By Gimme
@The Martins
I am a heterosexual male that finds young scantily women with shapely legs to be sexually stimulating.
I also have a diaper fetish.
I am perfectly capable of getting off and getting my partner off in bed. I have been with many women over the years. Only with one partner have I thought about diapers during the throes of sex. She also had the same fetish, and we used it to develop our healthy, sexual lifestyle.
Am I perverted because I lead a sexual lifestyle that both me and my partner enjoyed quite a bit (and harmed neither of us)?
On top of that, some people find being demeaned, belittled, and debased sexually arousing.
So please, for the sake of the rest of humanity, do a little research before upchucking your words onto the internet.
I'll be honest, your comment made me quite upset. If you don't find something sexually stimulating, then don't worry about it. Some people have fetishes. Some people have weird fetishes: Literally every object on this planet is sexualized by at least one person. Chances are, you have been with or will be with someone who has a fetish. Respect these facts. If you don't, then you're a douchebag. That's right. A douchebag.
Monday 08 February
By Michael
This is the exact opposite of porn: it could turn a guy off women entirely.
But you didn't include that in your survey.
@northerner: yeah, fetishes, yeah, free country. But it's also free for me to say your fetish is lame.
Reply
Monday 08 February
By northerner
Michael,
And I absolutely respect and welcome your opinion. You're right, to you and others it is lame. But there are more who enjoy this fetish than you might think. They keep it to themselves and enjoy small group blogs about it. It's a normal bodily function, a normal biological process. Some find pleasure in it, rather than a nuisance. As I said, the taking of it to its extremes is disgusting to most who enjoy the fetish and that applies to only a few extremists, but again, it's their choice. It's not hurting anyone. I prefer my mentioned fetish of long and lovely legs and a short skirt perched atop strappy stiletto heels (as in Blake Lively, to name one). Now there's something women have that's definitely not a turn off.
Tuesday 09 February
By Michael
There are a lot of people who like Nickelback, too. Doesn't mean they have taste.
And long shapely legs isn't a fetish, it's a genetic feature designed to make the male of the species want to procreate. Like red buttocks on baboons. Nature is funny.
Friday 05 November
By Maranda
For your information porn isn't meant strictly for guys and I know plenty of people who do get off to this. Now stop being ignorant. Just because your tastes are average doesn't mean everyone's are.
Tuesday 09 February
By dude...
Dude. this fetish is not normal. Yes, there are other fetishes, but there are also people that suck horse dick. So, it's what is normal that is normal. Not the fact that everyone has a fetish.
Reply
Wednesday 17 February
By Adam
So wouldn't the fact that, as you say, "everyone has a fetish" therefore make it normal? And where do you have the authority to say it isn't normal? There are many different fetishes in the world just as much as there are reasons why someone would have a said fetish, and If you are so closed mided about sexuality, then why are reading this article? Why am I reading this article? Because Ive been aware of this fetish, among many others, for well over a decade. This seems to be the one fetish that everyone in the media wants to make fun of, from springer to tyra to these little articles that aol links up to. btw, it's technically not porn without at least seeing genitalia and definitely not real porn without penetration or the use of masturbation within the video.
Friday 19 February
By Cory
You are stating that it isn't normal for people to have fetish's of many different kinds. Yes there are fetish's that aren't common and can be agreed by more than one person that are disgusting but to state something isn't " normal "... what is normal? We are all different individuals with a different equilibrium for our lives. Your normal is different then my normal and my normal is different then her normal and her normal is different then everyone else's normal. Watch how you state normal, people need to stop using it like its something so easily understood.
Friday 12 February
By Just Asking
The diapers would work is certain situations ....Have you ever been sleeping , or dreaming and have the urge to pee and not want to get up out of bed ?
Reply
Saturday 13 February
By Raquel
It's not a fetish that does anything for me. Then again, most fetishes don't. Perhaps is the idea of helplessness that would turn someone on who enjoyed women in diapers? Maybe it appeals to their nurturing side? Regardless, the woman here is obviously of legal age. If she had been very young looking, I'd say that might be crossing the line. Since she actually looks like a woman, though, I say there's nothing wrong with it, as odd as it may seem to us.
Reply
Sunday 14 February
By misha
Her duece face is hilarious.
Reply
Monday 15 February
By Raven
This would fall under the category of porn. Even if it does porn is part of free speech, there is nothing wrong with labeling something porn. I do believe in most of the 50 states porn is legal to buy and sell. This is a fetish without a doubt. But remember that there are shoe fetishes that are seemingly just as innocent, but when looked at closer you realize that they should be labeled as porn. The question is would you want your child stumbeling on this. My answer is no. It is one thing for an adult who knows what it is that they are looking at to view it and do with it as they will lol, but to have it available for children to stumble on is really the question we should be answering. I am not one who believes that children should be sheltered from the world. Sex is natural and normal, but children as they grow and discover, will learn what their preferences are. It should not be from a random unexplained video.
Reply
Monday 15 February
By Carl2229
I am one of the many thousands of people (probably millions worldwide) who enjoy wearing diapers, as well as seeing women women wearing them. While I am a firm supporter of the first ammendment, I don't think that this is appropriate for you-tube.
There is a proper time and place for fetish films, but a public/family forum like you-tube isn't it. Legal? Certainly. Appropriate? Not in my opinion.
Reply
Wednesday 17 February
By Dan
I think it's hilarious and I think men spend way too much time thinking of ways to make women look foolish and degraded. This is just one of those ways.
Reply
Thursday 18 February
By BreezeTasia
I think the only thing this does is ENCOURAGE CHILD MOLESTATION!
Reply
Friday 05 November
By Maranda
That's ridiculous. They're are plenty of people in the adult baby/diaper lover community who want to recapture their moments of innocence through experiencing a piece of their childhood once more. They would never want to take from a child what ended for them so soon.
Friday 19 February
By vikki
I think this is just disgusting. Yes, some fetishes are very weird and sometimes disturbing to the majority of people. but if it was, say, girls popping ballons with their butts, or watching girls put on a variety of shoes (yes, this is the stuff that is on youtube as well, and its not hard to stumble apon it if you type in something general like "shoe advice") But there are some things that cross the line. Yes, these girls look "of age" but isnt there anyone else that agrees that it is just a safe way to dip into the pedofile fetish?? They make porn of girls whose faces and bodies make look of age, but they are playing with stuffed bears and wearing pink dresses with pigtails. Idk, maybe its just me. but if you have to put a girl in those kinds of setting (now getting all the way down to diapers), it dosent matter if her body is grown up, cuz thats obviously not what they're turned on by. their getting turned on by the setting of it being a child.
Reply