The good people at BoingBoing recently noted the 15-year anniversary of astronomer Clifford Stoll's painfully inaccurate prediction that the Internet will fail. Stoll argued in a 1995 Newsweek story, "The truth is, no online database will replace your daily newspaper, no CD-ROM can take the place of a competent teacher, and no computer network will change the way government works." Fifteen years later, the newspaper industry is dying, people earn degrees online, and we read incredible facts about Chuck Norris.
But we're not here to skewer Stoll. He's a talented person who made a bad call. He even left a lighthearted comment on the story: "Wrong? Yep. At the time, I was trying to speak against the tide of futuristic commentary on how The Internet Will Solve Our Problems." He added, "Now, whenever I think I know what's happening, I temper my thoughts: Might be wrong, Cliff ..."
Stoll is definitely not alone with his 1995 "howler," as he describes it. Check out this roster of other bold predictions that completely whiffed. We predict that you will be amused.
"Using Twitter for literate communication is about as likely as firing up a CB radio and hearing some guy recite 'The Iliad.'" -- Bruce Sterling, a science-fiction writer and journalist, told The New York Times.Although Newsweek has said, "All the world's a-Twitter," and John Stewart has made light of it, not everyone has praised the 140-character platform. Still, Twitter has more than proven itself in the eyes of many, thanks to roles in breaking news and helping organize massive protests in Iran.
"For the most part, the portable computer is a dream machine for the few ... On the whole, people don't want to lug a computer with them to the beach or on a train to while away hours they would rather spend reading the sports or business section of the newspaper. "Somehow, the microcomputer industry has assumed that everyone would love to have a keyboard grafted on as an extension of their fingers. It just is not so ... Because no matter how inexpensive the machines become, and no matter how sophisticated their software, I still can't imagine the average user taking one along when going fishing." -- Erik Sandberg-Diment, the founder of the early computer magazine ROM, said in a Dec. 8, 1985, op-ed in the New York Times
In fact, there are now fishing apps for the iPhone.
"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft. Speaking of the iPhone, not everyone was as convinced as Steve Jobs that the device would become a cultural icon, or that it would garner such impressive market share in just a few years.
"We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." -- Decca Recording Co., rejecting The Beatles, 1962Dick Rowe, Decca's record executive, uttered the fateful prediction to Beatles manager Brian Epstein, who pleaded for Rowe to reconsider. Decca reportedly went a step further and said, "The Beatles have no future in show business."
Well, not exactly. The Beatles released a ridiculous 19 albums in the ensuing seven years and have sold approximately 140 million copies and a gazillion singles to date. Perhaps more impressive, they inspired "Beatlemania," and their presence reduced thousands of teenage girls to hysterical crying. Dick Rowe did sign the Rolling Stones and Van Morrison, by the way.
"TV will never be a serious competitor for radio because people must sit and keep their eyes glued on a screen; the average American family hasn't time for it." -- author unknown, from The New York Times, 1939It's all too easy to take pot shots at the boob tube, and this was true long before the idiots of "Jersey Shore" or the lowbrow antics of "Celebrity Fear Factor." We've been told TV rots our brains and turns our kids on to sex and violence. But is it just a fad?
Bonus: In a 1994 speech to the National Press Club in Washington, Viacom and CBS Chairman Sumner Redstone said, "I will believe in the 500-channel world only when I see it," according to Ken Auletta's book "Googled."
"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" -- the heads of RCA respond to David Sarnoff's pitch for investment in radioThe Golden Age of Radio (no, not the time before Howard Stern moved to satellite) might never have galvanized a nation during WWII and the Great Depression had everyone listened to David Sarnoff's powerful bosses at RCA in the 1920s. An immigrant from what is now Belarus, Sarnoff would eventually found NBC, and was one of the most influential executives in radio and TV in a career that spanned from the nineteen-teens to his retirement in 1970.
Of course, after a few years, RCA would own radio stations and produce listening devices, so the bosses soon "got it."
"The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon." -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon-Extraordinary to Queen Victoria 1873How far we've come. Heart-bypass surgery is a fairly routine operation, and neurosurgery is an entire field of medicine, although the procedures are often very risky.
"Printed books will never be the equivalent of handwritten codices, especially since printed books are often deficient in spelling and appearance." -- the 15th-century monk Trithemius wrote In his treatise "In Praise of Copying" In a recent feature story on the history of handwriting, Miller-McCune magazine points out that the European monks who toiled over exquisitely copied manuscripts weren't all too thrilled with the invention of the printing press. In addition to the fact that they were losing the medium to show off their prowess in drawing ornate, and largely illegible, illuminated letters, they worried that printing "was too liable to foibles and the idiosyncratic mark of the man helming the press. A hand-copied manuscript was, for them, the authoritative, exact, regularized text," according to Miller-McCune.
Tell us your favorite awful predictions in the comments.


























'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
St. Louis Sports Bar Gives Man Receipt Criticizing His Child
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
'Lone Ranger' Star Johnny Depp Opens Up About Split From Vanessa Paradis
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work







Comments:
Add a comment
Saturday 24 April
By collin
Brett Favre will retire-any NFL contributor
Reply
Sunday 25 April
By Meliss
That was my exact first thought! A prediction that has been being made for years!
Sunday 25 April
By BUKE
Stoll made a bad choice of Barbers also.
Reply
Sunday 25 April
By GB
Still have to agree with Decca Records, the Beatles did suck...
Sunday 25 April
By J.J.
WHAT barber???!!!
...and to GB :... make no mistake about Decca records kicking themselves in their collective asses over their major mistake about the Beatles. It should be noted that at least three other record labels ALMOST made the same mistake about the Beatles, but later cashed in on them AFTER their appearance on Ed Sullivan in February of 1964 and the Capitol release of "I Want To Hold Your Hand". Only after then, did we get the pre-1964- recorded songs on these other labels.
Sunday 25 April
By thatbobguy
Decca gets a lot of blame for turning down the Beatles, but virtually every major label in the UK turned them down. Decca was the only one of those labels to actually give the Beatles an audition, so if anything, they were more on the ball than most.
Sunday 25 April
By k
No, even if the Beatles do suck, Decca made a bad decision, because the Beatles were successful. Turning down money is never a good decision. Personally, I think the Beatles' music belongs in dentist offices and elevators. But I'll take their money any old time.
Sunday 25 April
By James
Um, How did this article miss the biggest failed predictions of our age?!? The global warming hoax. All of these were made in 1970. 40 YEARS AGO!!!!
“We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
• Kenneth Watt, ecologist
“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
• George Wald, Harvard Biologist
“Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• Life Magazine, January 1970
“By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist
Reply
Sunday 25 April
By Thom
Right on, James as the media turns a blind eye and deaf ear to the amazing truth you point out, the largest hoax perpetratred on mankind because they "like" it - therefore it is true. There IS no objectivity in media!
Sunday 25 April
By Paul
In 1979, there was cover art on the Chicago Sun-Times, depicting the Sears Tower engulfed in a glacier. This was attached to an article, predicting the coming Ice Age. Some of us remember that.
Sunday 25 April
By JoJo
I was a young impressionable kid back when the headlines were screaming that the world was going to be covered in ice and that we only had a few more years left. That "we" must work on population control etc. My father was the one that put me at ease and told me that it wasn't going to happen, that the world goes through warm and cold temperature changes...and he was a MACHINIST!!! Nothing like good old COMMON SENSE and a knowledge of HISTORY over some of these idiots that need to get a few papers published.
I remember how frightened I was reading about all of this crap, and this is why I'm so offended by this green movement indoctrinating our kids and scaring the crap out of them for the almighty buck. This global warming issue is nothing more than a scam to gain more control over our daily lives, turn the US back about 100 years (so we will be more "equal" and not so scary to other nations) and more importantly, it's a great way to make a buck. Original estimates of Fat Al Gore's wealth have gone from 2 million when he was VP, to 100 million 8 years out of office, and a recent estimate has him near 500 million. All thanks to the dummies that keep sending him a check to offset their carbon footprint (the people of TN KNOW that he doesn't practice what he expects YOU to do!!)
Wake up and WISE up people. It's all a scam. Tell your Senator and Rep NO to Cap and Trade. It does NOT work in Spain (unemployment between 20-25%), but Obama still wants to copy their program. If it passes, MORE unemployment, SKYROCKETING (Obama's words) energy costs (remember how EVERYTHING went up when gas prices went up....just imagine when ALL energy costs skyrocket)
Sunday 25 April
By David
I think perhaps James quotes correctly, but has confused the last coming Ice Age scare [Erlich, Holdren, et. al.], coupled with overpopulation warnings at the end of a ~30-year cold cycle that ended in the late 1970s with the current scare of warming, which is quite understandable, because that scare [along with Holdren, et. al.] morphed into global warming scaremongering in the 1980s. The UN IPCC was formed [1988] -- in the middle of the last ~25-year warming cycle. We are now in a cold cycle for the past ten years, with “no statistically significant warming” [Phil Jones – February, 2010] in 15 years.
CO2, which is a trace gas and a necessary plant food, is what causes plants to be GREEN and GROW. Greenhouses pump concentrations of this life-giving gas into them to speed growth and health of their plants. Above 50ppm, CO2 saturates in its wavelength radiative abilities, and it cannot possibly do what the New World Order scaremongers have been predicting. All the climate prediction models have failed and Mother Nature cares not one whit about their still unproven and miserably failing hypothesis (which turned into a hoax after data manipulation).
Since the Climategate scandal broke late last year, scientists around the world, who, up until this point have been silenced and bullied, are standing up to the New World Order lead authors of the false and misleading UN IPCC reports, 30% of which were not peer reviewed as frudulently claimed by the UN IPCC director Rajendra Pachari.
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
--David Rockefeller in 1994 at a U.N. dinner
Sunday 25 April
By David
Before a spelling Nazi nabs me, I realize I left out the 'a' in "fraudulent" in the final paragraph before the Rockefeller quote. ;)
Sunday 25 April
By Darkauthor
Yeah well, I like to look at pictures of vanishing islands and shrinking ice caps. I like to look out my Pennsylvania window in the middle of December and not see snow on the ground and people walking around in light jackets. I like to look at graphs showing that the forest fire season in the west is growing longer meaning more deadly infernos. But apparently all this isn't true. My eyes must be liberals lieing to my brain.
Sunday 25 April
By JustAndyAnMe
I hate to crush your little, self-centered , republican bubble, James, but we DID do something about it, and thats why we've gotten as far as we have. Remember the onslaught of emissions controls that hit the new autos of the early 70s?....among other things.
It not a hoax, just in case you haven't seen the latest TV ads STILL in the making.
Sunday 25 April
By wtfever
It doesn't matter if global warming is a hoax or not! it's still good to recycle! it's still good to invest in other energy sources that do not cause a lot of air polution! You have no excuses not to do this! You can't just stand around spouting "oh well global warming doesn't exist so I don't have to do anything." because it makes you look just plain lazy.
Sunday 25 April
By glduff
Will Paul Ehrlick ever get tired of being terribly wrong?
Sunday 25 April
By Dan
To a smaller extent than predicted, there are urban dwellers in Mexico City, Tokyo and Bejing who do require facial masks to filter some of the pollution in the atmosphere should they venture outside. In the last several decades, steps have been taken to reduce the number of pollutants in the air we breathe. Smokestack scrubbers have been incorporated into industrial plants to reduce sulfur emissions. While the original prediction was inaccurate in its intensity, the problems of atmospheric pollution are still very real.
Sunday 25 April
By JackAssin
Yes, I thought that Clinton and Gore were off their rockers when they were telling of the coming of "The Information Highway." And even though I'd been known to park in libraries for 7 hour stretches and was a guru of the card catalog's Dewey Decimal System... well, I just couldn't see it, couldn't fathom it at all. Had never touched a word processor and hated the phone (still hate the phone), but now find my entire world dangling by a phone-line that's connected to this Dell PC.
Reply
Sunday 25 April
By P.E.
What about the guy who stated, "Everything that can be invented has been invented."