Kristin Romey is an anthropologist, explorer, former executive editor of Archeology Magazine and, most prestigiously, Asylum's scientific adviser.Robin Hood, with his stick-it-to-the-man attitude and posse of Merry Men, has been a favorite Hollywood character for almost a century now. Regardless of his various film incarnations -- which include an animated fox, a softcore swashbuckler, and a Chicago gangster played by Frank Sinatra -- this classic vigilante embodies the themes of justice, chivalry and romance (despite the silly Peter Pan hat).
Now Ridley Scott is taking the legend up a notch with Russell Crowe, which can be seen in theaters May 14th. The 12th-century crusader battles the evil Sheriff of Nottingham and ends up liberating England from the French (apparently without a silly hat). But did the real Robin Hood exist, and if he did, was he really the noble hero everyone believes he was?
Those in the believer camp point to royal records from 1225 that describe a fugitive named Robert Hod. (In England, "Robin" was the medieval version of "Robbie" or "Rob.") So while there's no proof that a man named Robin Hood fought in the Crusades, he may have been alive during the reign of "evil" King John (1167–1216). He may have been an infamous cus, because other criminals started calling themselves "Robin Hood," including gang leader William Robehod, by the late 1200s.
Skeptics point to earlier, pagan beliefs about a mischievous spirit that lived in the forest. In medieval May Day celebrations, traveling singers spun tales about "Robin of the Hood" ("hood" was an old English variation of "wood") and his devotion to Lady Marion, who represented the Virgin Mary. The nickname "Robin Hood," they argue, was eventually given to men who caused trouble in the woods.
Regardless of the origins of the Robin Hood myth, by the late 15th century, tales were being written about him and his exploits. In many, he's just a common hood (in the modern sense). It's only in later centuries that people begin to project the ideals of their own times onto the fugitive and his (ever-increasing) sidekicks, emphasizing his courage, his chivalry or his cleverness. In the 21st century, it looks like we're getting Robin Hood as the Gladiator of Sherwood Forest -- a medieval Tea Partier fighting against a crooked leader and marauding foreigners. Now, is he going to demand that King John cough up that birth certificate?
| Real. Vigilantes are the lifeblood of democracy. | |
|---|---|
| Legend. Tights and a green leotard? Let's hope he isn't real |


























Lingerie Worker Claims She Was Fired For Being 'Too Hot'
What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
Preserve Your Budget by Freezing Foods -- Savings Experiment
Grieving Pit Bull Refused to Leave Dead Companion's Side
Facebook's IPO Debacle, Day 3: Un-Friended and Dis-Liked on Wall Street
It's Legal To Shoot And Kill Animal Poachers, Indian State Orders
Jennifer Lopez, Casper Smart TV Show: J.Lo to Star in Reality Series With Boyfriend (REPORT)
Vet Saves His Own Cat's Life After Car Accident







Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 14 May
By Horne
The long bow came to England from Wales with Edward1 in the 14th century. King John was not bad. His reputation was put out by the catholic church that hated him for refusing to send money to Rome. It is unlikely that Richard 3 ever lived in England during his reign.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By George
I simply enjoy the fantasy of reading of Robin Hood, be he a real person or a figment of some creative writer's imagination. Screw your politics and all that nonsense...
Reply
Friday 14 May
By gregg
some people whine and complain about ANYTHING!!!!! IT'S JUST A MOVIE!!! GET OVER IT
Reply
Friday 14 May
By MAGOOS
Political discourse enters every non-related debate and now poor old Robin gets to suffer. Hood was a Republican without doubt. He probably robbed the poor to give to the rich; there lies the true myth.
BTW, the word liberal did not exist in Hood's time.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By John R. Halliday
History is about to repeat itself. God bless everyone and good luck.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By mike
Enough of the stinking politics. This was a movie review. So old about all the lame political commentary in the posts.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By Gary
"Robin Hood fought against real injustice and oppression".......Sorry, you're mistaken. Richard almost bankrupted the country while he spent almost 10 years, and the public treasury, at the Crusades. The crushing taxation was the result of Richard - then King, not his brother, John, then Regent. To claim you were a Saxon, fighting to save England from a brutal Norman King, you'd have to fight Richard. As for Robin Hood somehow fighting to save England from the French, that's nonsense. England and most of France were the same country -- William the Conqueror was from Normandy. Richard was his grandson. So was John. All Normans. A Saxon would be a traitor to his people to fight for either one of them.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By Gary
"Hood was a Republican without doubt. He probably robbed the poor to give to the rich; there lies the true myth"........I guess you have an overactive imagination. Robin Hood was the prototype for communism - from each according to his ability, to each, according to his need. He made no distinction about whether the money he stole was earned or stolen, merely that the victims were "rich." He also made no distinction about passing it out, either - he apparently gave to scumbags and saints alike - THAT is collectivism, my friend, not capitalism.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By Student
I have been writing an essay on Robin Hood for a while, not necessarily on the validity of the character as an historical figure but rather examining the information that has so altered the character over time. I have, however, gained some information as to whether or not the character is real.
Firstly, the records of Robin Hood are not only restricted to court records. There are religious recordings of peasants refusing to partake in church in favour of attending Robin Hood celebrations. Although this is not evidence for the validity of the character it does support the claim that the ballads were in circulation long before they were written.
Secondly, it is not during the reign of King John that he has been placed, at least in the earliest ballads, but rather under the reign of one of the Edwards. It is not specified which Edward but it would certainly explain why there are no records of him joining the crusades.
Another thing to be deduced from the ballads is that Robin Hood was never a 'Noble' as he is portrayed in the films but rather called a 'Yeoman' this is basically a freedman and not any noble lord. The dispossessed noble came both from the later 18th century ballads as well as the film interpretations in which Maid Marian was introduced. Coincidentally Marian was actually part of a French Legend and she and Robin were paired together as King and Queen of the May Games.
Although these offer no conclusive evidence as to the historical validity of Robin Hood it does offer some information as to the historical groundings of the character.
This information is gained from books written by J.C Holt, A.J Pollard, S Knight, M Dixon-Kennedy, Lord Raglan and M Whittock. They are interesting reads if you're looking for some information on Robin Hood.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By haroldcheeks
Did Robin Hood ever exist?
David 'Robber' Lewis made a reputation for himself in the early 1800s, robbing the rich and giving to the poor. He was captured in 1820 and on his deathbed, he confessed to all his crimes and told his jailers of three caches of gold he had hidden in Pennsylvania:
So this proves there were men who stole from tax collectors and such, and gave money to the poor. So could there have been a real Robin Hood of Sherwood, sure.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By Richard
I don't really know if tea party people are nuts, faciast, or what....I do know that our present government is made up of crooks, liars and people who would sell this country out for a buck. Attached to their offices are the relatives, good ole boys, and ass kissers who rake down appointed and created jobs. All the while, they are sticking it to the American worker and CITIZENS of this country. They can carry on a war thousands of miles away, but can't protect our borders from illegals and drug lords. They hand millions out to dictators, cronies, and countries that hate us, but can't provide a decent meal in public schools, or a job for future generations. So I say any group that wants to vote them all out of office deserves my attention and maybe my vote.
Reply
Friday 14 May
By Harold
The tea Party Richard is made up of everyday citizens of all parties and walks of life who are unhappy with just what you said.
"I do know that our present government is made up of crooks, liars and people who would sell this country out for a buck. Attached to their offices are the relatives, good ole boys, and ass kissers who rake down appointed and created jobs."
The Tea Party is made up of farmers, carpenters and such. They are mom's dad's grandmothers and grandfathers sons and daughters and brothers and sisters of all differant races and creeds. They arent left, they arent right, just everyday folks sick and tired of the BS going on in DC.
Its clear for anyone to see that our Constitution is being trampled, it needs to be upheld, its there for a reason.
Thursday 20 May
By Paul
Another leftist punk politicizing a movie commentary.
Reply
Saturday 15 May
By glinda
I fell in love with British actor Jonas Armstrong as Robin Hood. They brought the hero and the humor. It was played more like the Errol Flynn version with a mixture of fantasy, humor, realism and romance. It was geared to a modern audience and was popular with all age groups. I think everyone who loved it truly hated to see it end. I think what Crowe and Scott are doing is like what they did in King Arthur with Clive Owen. They are trying to find any truth in the legend. Most legends I believe hold a grain of truth and I am willing to embrace that. I loved King Arthur.
Reply
Tuesday 18 May
By RH
The poll is flawed. Robin Hood is not about protecting democracy and capitalism, but instead to promote fairness and socialism.
He steals from the corrupt powerful rich, to give to the poor victims of democracy and capitalism.
Jesus was also a Socialist. So was Buddha and every other Hero, real or fictional.
Reply
Monday 31 May
By Rusty
First of all this comment about the tea parties wasn't needed for a movie description or review but what the character does I've got to say thank you. The goverment at that time was wrong and he stood up to it fictional or true. And that is what the tea partiers of today are doing. They are not anything more than Americans that are fed up with the goverment crap. They are protesting big goverment which history has shown never works. We want a smaller goverment that is truly there for the people not the other way around. I love liberals and conservatives the same. Because we as a whole make a good country but if we keep going down the road we are we will have what you see in that movie a place no one would like to call home.
Reply