Ever since its creation in 1979, the Happy Meal has had a strange hold over children. We can remember being 6 years old, pining badly for the kid's meal, mostly because it came with a "toy."Looking back, our behavior didn't make a whole lot of sense; whatever cheaply made trinket that McDonald's included in that magic cardboard box with a burger, fries and soft drink would clearly be inferior to 95 percent of the toys we already had at home. Yet we were still insanely jealous of the kid with the guilt-addled, divorced parents who let him get Happy Meals every night for dinner and had the roster of Taiwanese-made plastic treats to prove it.
Happy meals are still very popular among the young set. Because they are often used to market new movies, the toys have gotten considerably more elaborate.
If Santa Clara County, in California, has its way, however, the long reign of the Happy Meal toy will end. Last month the county's board of supervisors, citing out-of-control childhood obesity rates, voted 3 to 2 to ban restaurants from adding toys to meals with more than 485 calories -- which would include Happy Meals.
At first sniff, this story outraged us -- a Happy Meal without a toy is like an American flag without the stars. However, upon less-emotional reflection, and a review of the childhood obesity stats, maybe those meddlesome local politicians are onto something.
Let us know what you think, and read on for the pros and cons of taking the "happy" out of the Happy Meal.
| No way -- that's ridiculous | |
|---|---|
| Probably not -- but childhood obesity rates need to be addressed | |
| Yes -- if the government doesn't step in, the country will literally sink |
Bad Idea, Santa Clara!
Why not just ban kid's meals with over 485 calories? If anything, that all-new "Shrek Forever After" toy is going to keep fatty junior too busy to demand that his stressed-out mom hook him up with a yummy apple pie desert -- and maybe some more French fries.
If you take the fun out of childhood junk-food consumption, the little tykes will be forced to grow up fast. And that means the elementary school set will soon discover more sophisticated fast food options, like Starbucks, which features quite a few drinks that have more calories than Happy Meals.
Right On!
Everybody flipped out about that 2-year-old from Indonesia who chain smokes. And while a Happy Meal habit isn't as bad as a two-pack-a-day habit, if you've seen "Super Size Me," you know the awful things a McDonald's-heavy diet can do to the human body. And those inexplicably addictive little toys are to Happy Meals as nicotine is to cigarettes.
As the appetites of our nation's youths get more and more out of control, we're going to need to ban Happy Meal toys -- or run the risk of a choking epidemic.


























Fast Food CEO Shuts Down Struggling Branch During 'Undercover Boss' Episode
Fla. School Bus Dispatcher Suspended With Pay After Allegedly Aiding Bank Robbery
This is why you need a dash cam on at all times [UPDATE]
The Hidden $1,000 Bonus Obama Put in Your Paycheck
House of the Day: David Hyde Pierce's Spanish Palace
Money and Power: The Richest and Poorest U.S. Presidents
Women Guitarist Dead: Christopher Reimer, 26, Dies in His Sleep
Art and Superheroines: When Over-Sexualization Kills the Story [Sex]
The Tax Break That Millions Miss Out On
Replacements' Slim Dunlap Hospitalized After Stroke







Comments:
Add a comment
Tuesday 01 June
By Franklin
"... if you've seen "Super Size Me," you know the awful things a McDonald's-heavy diet can do to the human body."
No. If you've seen that film, all you've seen is Morgan Spurlock deliberately make himself sick by avoiding all physical activity while disingenuously placing all the blame on his diet.
Reply
Tuesday 01 June
By Takahashi
It's not really the governments place in my opinion. Sure child obesity is a problem, but more has to come from the homestead to fix it.
Reply
Tuesday 22 June
By Mike Sauers
How about the parents taking the blame for feeding them the food in the first place. They are the ones taking them to Mcdonald's. If they are so worried about it then they should stop going there "Every night " You are their parents its not the governments job to regulate what you feed your own kids ,,It is yours!!
Wednesday 02 June
By UK Wholesalers
I don't think so to ban Happy Meal toys because toys are one best source you can attract children. Happy Meal's best selling is due to those toys. Its obvious if you ban those toys then you will see a sharp downfall in happy meal sales..
Reply
Wednesday 02 June
By raptorspike
How about this crazy idea. If the kids do get Happy Meals, make a once a week treat. I used to get happy meals on Fridays to celebrate the end of the week. I was fairly normal in my height/weight/age ratio. It wasn't until college where I spent a lot of time on the couch doing work that I gained weight.
Reply
Friday 13 August
By Tommilyn
I think that parents should be responsible for what their children eat. McDonalds has the right to sell thier product. Happy meals should be eaten as a treat not as part of an everyday diet. Its the parents that are too lasy to make a home cooked meal that are to blame. After all children aren't driving themselves to McDonalds. I have three children I work full time 3rd shift and still have time in my busy schedule to make breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. My children are treated with Happy Meals its not a part of their regular diet.
Reply