
In honor of AOL's Geek Awards on Aug. 18, we've declared it Geek History Month. Embrace your roots, as we revisit some important events in technology, gaming, sci-fi and more.
The construction of Space Shuttle Enterprise is probably one of the greatest achievements accomplished in the name of geekdom. Not only was the orbiter the first re-usable space shuttle, a rocket type which has since been used for dozens of space missions, the way the ship was named showed the entire world that if enough geeks unite they can change history.
As we celebrate 33 years since the SS Enterprise took its first flight, let's explore at exactly how things went down.
Soon after the Apollo mission successfully proved the moon was not made out of cheese, the U.S. government realized that space flight was going to become a lot more common, especially if you wanted a bunch of satellites and an International Space Station. This was awesome for scientists and rocket manufacturers, but it would mean that things would get very expensive, very fast. A few tons of fuel, thousands of dollars worth of special equipment and months of training -- before you know it your budget has a huge rocket-shaped sinkhole.
Inspired by this idea, NASA launched the Space Shuttle Program, completing the first ship on Sept. 17, 1976. The first space shuttle was supposed to be named "Constitution." While we agree that the founding document of the United States is a monumental achievement, it's simply not the right thing to name a spaceship.
And we weren't the only ones to think so; in fact about 200,000 people agreed with us. That's how many wrote directly to president Gerald Ford demanding that NASA change the name of the space ship to "Enterprise."
In the "Star Trek" series, all ships were named after famous space shuttles of the past. So, in a paradoxical way, by naming a real-life shuttle after the Star Trek ship, NASA validated its plot line by providing an explanation for where the Enterprise name came from. If that makes perfect sense to you, congratulations, you're a true Star Trek fan.
Ironically enough, the Space Shuttle Enterprise never actually flew "where no man has gone before." It never even left the Earth's orbit. Since it was the first shuttle in the program, it was meant more as a prototype, a testing unit for Space Shuttle Columbia, which followed it a few years later.
Originally, NASA wanted to retrofit Enterprise and make it space-ready, but engineers abandoned the plan when they realized that building a new ship, Challenger, would end up being cheaper. And so the fate of the Enterprise was sealed after only 16 tests, including only five flights, the first one of which took place on August 12, 1977.
Once the tests were complete, the shuttle was donated to the Smithsonian institute where Star Trek fans regularly visit it. Pictures and footage of the ship were included in later "Star Trek" episodes, and several cast members can be seen in photos outside the real Enterprise.
And this was all possible because Star Trek fans are seriously dedicated people.


























The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Visit the Maldive Islands Before It's Too Late
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Springtime Budget-Busters -- Savings Experiment
Is This Woman Too Pretty To Work?
Editorial: Engadget on the Xbox One
Parents Face Tough Choice When Tornadoes Bear Down
Mariah Carey Suffers Wardrobe Malfunction on Good Morning America







Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 12 August
By John F.C. Taylor
Aside from the use of the childish term Trekkies, not a bad article. Prefered term and more mature is Trekkers. Only thing that would have made this better would have been to actually see Enterprise in space on some real shuttle missions.
Reply
Thursday 12 August
By Patrick
Part of the Kithomer accord was the recognition that "Trekker" and "Trekkie" are interchangeable phrases used in common parlance to describe sexless geeks. Not really, but it is time to let go and let flow, brother. Trekkies get laid, Trekkers never do.
Thursday 12 August
By William
The term "Trekkies" is the correct term for those childish adults such as yourself who want to be known by a certain term just because you watch Star Trek. To use a term such as "Trekker" is to imply that you are actually achieving something. Grow up already! Watching a television show is not an accomplishment! What is also certain is that your parents would prefer you move out of their basement already!
Thursday 12 August
By Dr. J
I thought "Trekkies" were fans of the original series, while "Trekkers" like me were fans of The Next Generation... and beyond.
BTW, Why is everyone but Captain Kirk in the picture?
Dr. J
Friday 13 August
By Islangers
I went to the 'Star Trek Convention' at the Americana Hotel in NYC in 1974 with my friends. It was a blast. I was barely a teenager, and we were proud to be known as 'Trekkies.' It was an exciting time, and I grew up fairly normal, moving out of my parents basement right after college. Never went for 'Next Gen' or any other 'sequel' show. Just didn't seem the same.
-happy family man in NYC,
Wayne
Friday 13 August
By Jeanne
I don't mind being called a "Trekkie", but I DO mind the term "geek"! The Star Trek series is anything by "geeky", in fact, it often inspires the mind. Far better stuff is shown on those series than these "real life" shows! Not just entertaining, but also thought processing stuff. The newer series became really what Star Trek was supposed to be like!
"Geeky" stuff to me is things like South Park and Spongebob~
Saturday 14 August
By John
I can say that I was a young adult in the seventies, and NEVER owned a leisure suit (or a nehru jacket)
Saturday 14 August
By Al Schrader
Gene Roddenberry was an incredible genius, especially in developing new characters. I worked on the team that built the shuttles satellite cargo pallets for the cargo bay. Today I'm the top physicist & they are testing my particle, the graviton, in the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva , Switzerland.
Some of the things I'm working on in my lab, I don't think Gene would even be ready for....Alfred-
Thursday 12 August
By excitron
Shatner is conspicuous in his absence in that photo. He hated the whole Trekkie thing, and probably still does.
Reply
Thursday 12 August
By Lisa
I actually have a clipped-out newspaper article covering that event saved away somewhere.
Reply
Thursday 12 August
By Tony
So Do I! I was one of the people who wrote Ford and recieved a nice responce from him. Go Enterprise. They should Name the next space ship that goes to the Moon or Mars Enterprise as well.
Thursday 12 August
By Derek
The article claims; "In the "Star Trek" series, all ships were named after famous space shuttles of the past. So, in a paradoxical way, by naming a real-life shuttle after the Star Trek ship, NASA validated its plot line by providing an explanation for where the Enterprise name came from. If that makes perfect sense to you, congratulations, you're a true Star Trek fan."
Sorry but WRONG!! Before anyone argues, yest I know on Picards Enterptise in the Next Generation the Shuttle Enterprise is depicted, as it is on Archers sEnterprise on Enterprise. But on the original series, which ran from 1966-69. There is nothing about the Shuttle Enterprise, or even the Shuttle program.
Reply
Thursday 12 August
By Dave
also lets not forget in the movies where they travel back in time and visit the nuclear powered "wessle" U.S.S Enterprise
Thursday 12 August
By Go, Wolf-Spider!
You seem to forget about The Motion Picture. It was a part of the mural on the rec deck. THAT mural is why I don't consider "Enterprise" part of Star Trek.
Wolf-Spider
Thursday 12 August
By mjorland
If the first shuttle, the Enterprise, was built in 1976, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for there to be any mention of the shuttle program in the original Star Trek series because there was no shuttle program in 1966!!!!
Friday 13 August
By James
Yeah, you are right that the Shuttle Enterprise or the program was not mentioned in the original series (66-69.) But then NASA was in the heighth of the race to the moon and the Apollo space program. Not many knew of the Shuttle program, and certainly it would not have been allowed to be mentioned on a television program.
Thursday 12 August
By LST
Considering how the world has spiraled downhill since the 70's, I only wish Scotty would beam me the hell out of here!
Reply
Friday 13 August
By Rusty
I agree with you wholeheartedly. On December 31, 1979 -- as I sat watching a '70s retrospective just before midnight -- I just KNEW that a special, hopeful era was coming to an end. I had turned 14 two months earlier, and with each passing year thereafter, I could feel my hopes and aspirations dying.
Thursday 12 August
By cliff corson
actually they didn't build a "new" shuttle when they built challenger.
Challenger was a structural test airframe (STA-099) it was later decided to upgrade her to flight status rather than upgrading the enterprise that was built very differently than the columbia was
Reply
Thursday 12 August
By LST
I'd rather be aboard Picard's Enterprise; NCC 1701-D
Reply