It became very clear to me sometime in my early 20s that working for a living was a complete scam. After a couple of years spent clocking in 40-hour weeks, I realized that I wanted nothing to do with a system that offered me such meager compensation and ate up so much of my time. In a perfect world, my time would be mine to travel, learn to play the melodica and the sitar, download pornography, cry myself to sleep, play video games, cry in the shower, watch countless episodes of "Justice League Unlimited" in an unbroken stream and visit the finest restaurants in town, where I could sneak off into the bathroom and cry in seclusion.
And so I became a lab rat.
The life of a full-time, professional volunteer for pharmaceutical and medical research studies is like being handed the keys to the Kingdom of Easy Money and Free Time. All that crying up there? Tears of joy, friends, for the ease with which I was able to live my life. And you can do it, too. It's simple.
Keep reading to learn how to rent your body to science.
Step 1: Know What They AreThere are facilities throughout America that offer paid compensation in exchange for your participation in clinical pharmaceutical research studies.
While each study varies, the basics are pretty consistent: For a set amount of time, you agree to check in to a research clinic, where you won't be allowed to leave, and take an experimental, non-FDA-approved drug that they're testing. You'll be poked and prodded, have blood drawn sometimes as often as 20 times a day, eat tasteless, Dharma Initiative–caliber food and live with others who have chosen this as their line of work.
Your main task, besides being stuck incessantly with needles, will be to report the side effects of the drug. Eventually, some years down the line, if your drug is approved by the FDA, a calm-voiced narrator will rattle off some of the things you've reported at the end of a commercial, warning potential patients that they may feel what you've felt. This will fill you with great pride.
Step 2: Find a Study
Towns with a large university tend to have facilities for drug studies -- Austin, Texas, and Madison, Wis., are each home to some of the more popular clinics, though they pop up throughout this great land of ours. Full lists can be found on websites like Guinea Pigs Get Paid and Just Another Lab Rat.
Each facility's screening process varies, but in any case, you'll be required to undergo a physical so they can determine whether you dropping dead minutes after taking the drug was a side effect and not because you were on the verge of death to begin with. You'll also be measured for various other requirements, like a basic BMI fitness level and blood pressure. If you meet these, you'll probably be admitted.
Step 3: Be PatientLife inside a drug study's facility is kind of like going to camp, but with no activities and lots of needles. The other participants will range from people who owe child support payments for their eight kids (each with a different woman) to wacky, Kramer-from-"Seinfeld"-like kooks.
You'll want to take a laptop and an iPod, though you'll need to be sure that there's no camera in either. When you're not being stuck with needles and forced drugs, you'll have plenty of free time. Been meaning to re-watch "Smallville" before the fateful 10th season? Well, there's time enough at last.
Studies range in length from a single weekend to up to six weeks, and your paycheck tends to average roughly $200 a night. If the idea of making six grand in a single month isn't appealing enough, imagine making six grand in a single month that you spent devouring the entire oeuvre of Jet Li. There'll be boring stretches, and the food will probably be nasty, but keep your eye on the prize and you'll make it.
Step 4: Get Out and Get Ready for the Next One
Each study has a wash-out period after you check out of the facility, so you don't start mixing unapproved, experimental drugs. Usually, it's about a month. Assuming that you're using your check for personal expenses, and not to cover massive gambling debts or something, now's the time to live it up: Save enough for taxes, which aren't deducted from the check in advance and then think about where you'd like to go next. Feel like spending some time in Chicago? Book a flight to the Windy City and then schedule a screening at Abbott Laboratories, in nearby Waukegan. Fancy a European vacation? Spend some of your massive check on international airfare, then get ready to check in at Paraxel in London. (Bonus: The exchange rate works in your favor here.) In a tropical mood? Head on down to Honolulu for an extended study at Covance.
Step 5: Retire, EventuallyThe first year or two that you're making a (good) living playing video games and watching movies inside of a clinical pharmaceutical research unit, it really does seem like you've found a cheat code for life: no boss, all the free time you can handle and easy money whenever you want it.
But, like all super-exciting things, there will come a time when you start to get sick of it. You'll be tired of having to explain the needle marks in your arms by telling the TSA security guy that you've found Jesus and are taking it a day at a time. Maybe you'll meet a girl who wants a boyfriend who's actually there and whose job she can explain to her mom.
When that day comes, listen to your instincts. There are all sorts of other careers for people with your experience set, and you'll come to appreciate the ability to do things like go outside every single day and not bleed from a hole in your arm. You don't need to close the door permanently -- if you decide that you need a used Jet Ski or season tickets for your favorite basketball team, the drug studies will still be waiting. No one can do this as a full-time career for more than about four years without becoming the exact sort of person that your friends worried you were when you first told them about your new scheme -- and you don't want to be that person. You'll have spent a whole bunch of time locked up in a clinic with that person. You'll hate him.
I made it a solid three years as a full-time lab rat, and the lure of the money has gotten me to sign up for a short study a couple of times in the ensuing years. It turns out there are a few jobs a person can get that actually provide some measure of satisfaction, and I'd recommend pursuing one of them, if you get the chance. But, in a bad economy where options can be limited, free money in exchange for testing drugs sure beats working a crappy job like a sucker.
Dan Solomon is regular contributor to Asylum, the Onion A.V. Club and MadeLoud. His body now belongs to his wife.
Sharon Hill: Weird Word Salad: The Terminology of the Unexplained


























Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Ricardo Cerezo, Facing Eviction, Finds $4.85 Million Lottery Ticket
MIT's cheetah robot runs faster, more efficiently, can carry its own power supply (video)
Forever 21 Worker Fired After She Tells Her Traumatic Story
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts







Comments:
Add a comment
Saturday 09 October
By RYAN
I dont think I could do this,this seems like the worst idea of all time.My wife ISNT from the USA but shes been here for 10 years.I pointed out to her all the drug companies and their tv ads and I told her to listen close.They try to sell you whatever drug and then they tell you all the bad stuff it does to you.Birth control pill,may cause your a*s to fall off,your eyes to turn purple,your heart to explode killing anyone near you,your feet to catch fire and all your hair to fall out,BUT YOU WONT GET PREGNANT....she now laughs at the tv ads but would you want to be the guy that figured all that out?NOT ME MAN...Ill pass.
Reply
Saturday 09 October
By sadie
He says his body now belongs to his wife. I hope they aren't thinking about having children. All those drugs?
Reply
Saturday 09 October
By Thomas
I kind of thought this was an interesting article till the part of you going into the bathroom to cry???? what the hell is that? Thats what women do.
Then as I read on I realized not only are you a big sissy,(Wah, Wah, Wah,) but a damned super stupid one at that.... a few years from now when you start having all the side effects of all the drugs you've ingested, I just hope none of my grandchildren are anywhere near you in the bathroom as you wah, wah, wah.
Sincerely, Concerned, future Grandpa!
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By BOOGER NOSE
Is it true what they say, that'wah wah wah " is a signal you like little boys?
Saturday 09 October
By Carole Mann
How dumb is this guy, letting God knows how many non-fda approved drugs be put into his system. Good luck keeping his health over the years.
My husband remembers trials of LSD years ago before its effects were known. I wonder how many of those participants are still around.
Reply
Saturday 09 October
By deb
okay (a) you wouldn't have a LIFE...i.e. friends, family, kids, or any other NORMAL obligations that make life worth living if you lived this way and (b) those "side effects" sometimes sound worse than the disease...worse than needle marks on your arms...dry mouth, bowel movement irregularities, headaches, dizziness, nausea, weight loss, weight gain, constipation, etc.etc...are you kidding me? You trade being a healthy person for all that and a bit of cash? Oh, and by the way, they are called EXPERIMENTAL drugs for a reason...how do you know what the side effects will be of any of them 10 years from now (not even the MD's know that!)
Reply
Saturday 09 October
By Jadama
He sure like to cry a lot...
Reply
Saturday 09 October
By lesli
I understand the risks this guy took with his life, and thank him for undertaking those risks so I don't have too. But what gets me about drug company testing is the article I read a few years ago that stated that all the data they collect from a woman during her monthly cycle is thrown out. Even when they are testing birth control. They only use the "unisex" data. Which is why all drugs carry a warning not to breastfeed or become pregnant while on the drug, because they have no idea what will happen. That to me is way scarier!
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By Don
It's understandable that some people may develop heath problems testing drugs - that's why they are tested! Just think about it next time you take an FDA approved prescription - every drug you take (be it over the counter or prescribed by a physician) has been tested on people - I thank the people who choose to test these drugs, and so should anyone else that takes any kind of medication.
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By Melissa
In grad school, I padded me insufficient student worker income by doing linguistics and psych tests. It's much less likely to cause you any physical problems, but it also pays a whole heck of a lot less. The most I made in a month was $100.
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By Lily
This article is irresponsible because it going to draw in individuals that think it will be okay if you make a few bucks. Never allow yourself to be an experiment. You and your health are worth far more than what they are offering. Money comes and goes but there is only one of you!
Reply
Monday 11 October
By Heidi Lao
Everyone has become an experimental animal/lab rat for the Physiological High Technologies without knowing it for life. Look up the energies weapons such as the electromagnetic weapons, the laser weapons, the magnetic weapons, ultrasound wave, infrasound wave weapons, etc. They could control all existing normal physiologies in our body, and creat new ones the not existing. The whole book of ICD-9-CM is the list of the PHT abuses. Look up the mental disease symptoms--they tell you how much they could control the brain function. Look up the ghost stories, you will find the PHT weapons could create visual hallucinations, auditory hallucination, and emotional controls. Many mental diseases were not real existing diseases. The psychiatrist or psychologist comes up with those names without knowing the PHT functions, or someone used a mental disease name to cover up their PHT experiments
Look up an article--The Mind has not Firewall.
The Mind Has No Firewall
by Mr. Timothy L. Thomas
Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
________________________________________
This article first appeared in the Spring 1998 issue of Parameters
________________________________________
"It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such weapons will achieve incomparable superiority."
Major I. Chernishev, Russian Army 1
The human body, much like a computer, contains myriad data processors. They include, but are not limited to, the chemical-electrical activity of the brain, heart, and peripheral nervous system, the signals sent from the cortex region of the brain to other parts of our body, the tiny hair cells in the inner ear that process auditory signals, and the light-sensitive retina and cornea of the eye that process visual activity. 2 We are on the threshold of an era in which these data processors of the human body may be manipulated or debilitated. Examples of unplanned attacks on the body's data-processing capability are well-documented. Strobe lights have been known to cause epileptic seizures. Not long ago in Japan, children watching television cartoons were subjected to pulsating lights [1] that caused seizures in some and made others very sick.
Defending friendly and targeting adversary data-processing capabilities of the body appears to be an area of weakness in the US approach to information warfare theory, a theory oriented heavily toward systems data processing and designed to attain information dominance on the battlefield. Or so it would appear from information in the open, unclassified press. This US shortcoming may be a serious one, since the capabilities to alter the data processing systems of the body already exist. A recent edition of U.S. News and World Report highlighted several of these "wonder weapons" (acoustics, microwaves, lasers) and noted that scientists are "searching the electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths that can affect human behavior." 3 A recent Russian military article offered a slightly different slant to the problem, declaring that "humanity stands on the brink of a psychotropic war" with the mind and body as the focus. That article discussed Russian and international attempts to control the psycho-physical condition of man and his decision making processes by the use of VHF-generators, "noiseless cassettes," and other technologies.
An entirely new arsenal of weapons, based on devices designed to introduce subliminal messages or to alter the body's psychological and data processing capabilities, might be used to incapacitate individuals. These weapons aim to control or alter the psyche, or to attack the various sensory and data-processing systems of the human organism. In both cases, the goal is to confuse or destroy the signals that normally keep the body in equilibrium.
This article examines energy-based weapons, psychotropic weapons, and other developments designed to alter the ability of the human body to process stimuli. One consequence of this assessment is that the way we commonly use the term "information warfare" falls short when the individual soldier, not his equipment, becomes the target of attack.
Information Warfare Theory and the Data-Processing Element of Humans
In the United States the common conception of information warfare focuses primarily on the capabilities of hardware systems such as computers, satellites, and military equipment which process data in its various forms. According to Department of Defense Directive S-3600. 1 of 9 December 1996, information warfare is defined as "an information operation conducted during time of crisis or conflict to achieve or promote specific objectives over a specific adversary or adversaries." An information operation is defined in the same directive as "actions taken to affect adversary information and information systems while defending one's own information and information systems." These "information systems" lie at the heart of the modernization effort of the US armed forces and other countries, and manifest themselves as hardware, software, communications capabilities, and highly trained individuals. Recently, the US Army conducted a mock battle that tested these systems under simulated combat conditions.
US Army Field Manual 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics (released 30 September 1997), defines information warfare as "actions taken to achieve information superiority by affecting a hostile's information, information based-processes, and information systems, while defending one's own information, information processes, and information systems." The same manual defines information operations as a "continuous military operation within the military information environment that enables, enhances, and protects friendly forces' ability to collect, process, and act on information to achieve an advantage across the full range of military operations. [Information operations include] interacting with the Global Information Environment . . . and exploiting or denying an adversary's information and decision capabilities." 4
This "systems" approach to the study of information warfare emphasizes the use of data, referred to as information, to penetrate an adversary's physical defenses that protect data (information) in order to obtain operational or strategic advantage. It has tended to ignore the role of the human body as an information- or data-processor in this quest for dominance except in those cases where an individual's logic or rational thought may be upset via disinformation or deception. As a consequence little attention is directed toward protecting the mind and body with a firewall as we have done with hardware systems. Nor have any techniques for doing so been prescribed. Yet the body is capable not only of being deceived, manipulated, or misinformed but also shut down or destroyed-just as any other data-processing system. The "data" the body receives from external sources-such as electromagnetic, vortex, or acoustic energy waves-or creates through its own electrical or chemical stimuli can be manipulated or changed just as the data (information) in any hardware system can be altered.
The only body-related information warfare element considered by the United States is psychological operations (PSYOP). In Joint Publication 3-13. 1, for example, PSYOP is listed as one of the elements of command and control warfare. The publication notes that "the ultimate target of [information warfare] is the information dependent process, whether human or automated .... Command and control warfare (C2W) is an application of information warfare in military operations.... C2W is the integrated use of PSYOP, military deception, operations security, electronic warfare and physical destruction." 5
One source defines information as a "nonaccidental signal used as an input to a computer or communications system." 6 The human body is a complex communication system constantly receiving nonaccidental and accidental signal inputs, both external and internal. If the ultimate target of information warfare is the information-dependent process, "whether human or automated," then the definition in the joint publication implies that human data-processing of internal and external signals can clearly be considered an aspect of information warfare. Foreign researchers have noted the link between humans as data processors and the conduct of information warfare. While some study only the PSYOP link, others go beyond it. As an example of the former, one recent Russian article described offensive information warfare as designed to "use the Internet channels for the purpose of organizing PSYOP as well as for 'early political warning' of threats to American interests." 7 The author's assertion was based on the fact that "all mass media are used for PSYOP . . . [and] today this must include the Internet." The author asserted that the Pentagon wanted to use the Internet to "reinforce psychological influences" during special operations conducted outside of US borders to enlist sympathizers, ,,who would accomplish many of the tasks previously entrusted to special units of the US armed forces.
Others, however, look beyond simple PSYOP ties to consider other aspects of the body's data-processing capability. One of the principal open source researchers on the relationship of information warfare to the body's data-processing capability is Russian Dr. Victor Solntsev of the Baumann Technical Institute in Moscow. Solntsev is a young, well-intentioned researcher striving to point out to the world the potential dangers of the computer operator interface. Supported by a network of institutes and academies, Solntsev has produced some interesting concepts. 8 He insists that man must be viewed as an open system instead of simply as an organism or closed system. As an open system, man communicates with his environment through information flows and communications media. One's physical environment, whether through electromagnetic, gravitational, acoustic, or other effects, can cause a change in the psycho-physiological condition of an organism, in Solntsev's opinion. Change of this sort could directly affect the mental state and consciousness of a computer operator. This would not be electronic war or information warfare in the traditional sense, but rather in a nontraditional and non-US sense. It might encompass, for example, a computer modified to become a weapon by using its energy output to emit acoustics that debilitate the operator. It also might encompass, as indicated below, futuristic weapons aimed against man's "open system."
Solntsev also examined the problem of "information noise," which creates a dense shield between a person and external reality. This noise may manifest itself in the form of signals, messages, images, or other items of information. The main target of this noise would be the consciousness of a person or a group of people. Behavior modification could be one objective of information noise; another could be to upset an individual's mental capacity to such an extent as to prevent reaction to any stimulus. Solotsev concludes that all levels of a person's psyche (subconscious, conscious, and "superconscious") are potential targets for destabilization.
According to Solntsev, one computer virus capable of affecting a person's psyche is Russian Virus 666. It manifests itself in every 25th frame of a visual display, where it produces a combination of colors that allegedly put computer operators into a trance. The subconscious perception of the new pattern eventually results in arrhythmia of the heart. Other Russian computer specialists, not just Solntsev, talk openly about this "25th frame effect" and its ability to subtly manage a computer user's perceptions. The purpose of this technique is to inject a thought into the viewer's subconscious. It may remind some of the subliminal advertising controversy in the United States in the late 1950s.
US Views on "Wonder Weapons": Altering the Data-Processing Ability of the Body
What technologies have been examined by the United States that possess the potential to disrupt the data-processing capabilities of the human organism? The 7 July 1997 issue of U.S. News and World Report described several of them designed, among other things, to vibrate the insides of humans, stun or nauseate them, put them to sleep, heat them up, or knock them down with a shock wave. 9 The technologies include dazzling lasers that can force the pupils to close; acoustic or sonic frequencies that cause the hair cells in the inner ear to vibrate and cause motion sickness, vertigo, and nausea, or frequencies that resonate the internal organs causing pain and spasms; and shock waves with the potential to knock down humans or airplanes and which can be mixed with pepper spray or chemicals. 10
With modification, these technological applications can have many uses. Acoustic weapons, for example, could be adapted for use as acoustic rifles or as acoustic fields that, once established, might protect facilities, assist in hostage rescues, control riots, or clear paths for convoys. These waves, which can penetrate buildings, offer a host of opportunities for military and law enforcement officials. Microwave weapons, by stimulating the peripheral nervous system, can heat up the body, induce epileptic-like seizures, or cause cardiac arrest. Low-frequency radiation affects the electrical activity of the brain and can cause flu-like symptoms and nausea. Other projects sought to induce or prevent sleep, or to affect the signal from the motor cortex portion of the brain, overriding voluntary muscle movements. The latter are referred to as pulse wave weapons, and the Russian government has reportedly bought over 100,000 copies of the "Black Widow" version of them. 11
However, this view of "wonder weapons" was contested by someone who should understand them. Brigadier General Larry Dodgen, Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Policy and Missions, wrote a letter to the editor about the "numerous inaccuracies" in the U.S. News and World Report article that "misrepresent the Department of Defense's views." 12 Dodgen's primary complaint seemed to have been that the magazine misrepresented the use of these technologies and their value to the armed forces. He also underscored the US intent to work within the scope of any international treaty concerning their application, as well as plans to abandon (or at least redesign) any weapon for which countermeasures are known. One is left with the feeling, however, that research in this area is intense. A concern not mentioned by Dodgen is that other countries or non-state actors may not be bound by the same constraints. It is hard to imagine someone with a greater desire than terrorists to get their hands on these technologies. "Psycho-terrorism" could be the next buzzword.
Russian Views on "Psychotropic War"
The term "psycho-terrorism" was coined by Russian writer N. Anisimov of the Moscow Anti-Psychotronic Center. According to Anisimov, psychotropic weapons are those that act to "take away a part of the information which is stored in a man's brain. It is sent to a computer, which reworks it to the level needed for those who need to control the man, and the modified information is then reinserted into the brain." These weapons are used against the mind to induce hallucinations, sickness, mutations in human cells, "zombification," or even death. Included in the arsenal are VHF generators, X-rays, ultrasound, and radio waves. Russian army Major I. Chernishev, writing in the military journal Orienteer in February 1997, asserted that "psy" weapons are under development all over the globe. Specific types of weapons noted by Chernishev (not all of which have prototypes) were:
• A psychotropic generator, which produces a powerful electromagnetic emanation capable of being sent through telephone lines, TV, radio networks, supply pipes, and incandescent lamps.
• An autonomous generator, a device that operates in the 10-150 Hertz band, which at the 10-20 Hertz band forms an infrasonic oscillation that is destructive to all living creatures.
• A nervous system generator, designed to paralyze the central nervous systems of insects, which could have the same applicability to humans.
• Ultrasound emanations, which one institute claims to have developed. Devices using ultrasound emanations are supposedly capable of carrying out bloodless internal operations without leaving a mark on the skin. They can also, according to Chernishev, be used to kill.
• Noiseless cassettes. Chernishev claims that the Japanese have developed the ability to place infra-low frequency voice patterns over music, patterns that are detected by the subconscious. Russians claim to be using similar "bombardments" with computer programming to treat alcoholism or smoking.
• The 25th-frame effect, alluded to above, a technique wherein each 25th frame of a movie reel or film footage contains a message that is picked up by the subconscious. This technique, if it works, could possibly be used to curb smoking and alcoholism, but it has wider, more sinister applications if used on a TV audience or a computer operator.
• Psychotropics, defined as medical preparations used to induce a trance, euphoria, or depression. Referred to as "slow-acting mines," they could be slipped into the food of a politician or into the water supply of an entire city. Symptoms include headaches, noises, voices or commands in the brain, dizziness, pain in the abdominal cavities, cardiac arrhythmia, or even the destruction of the cardiovascular system.
There is confirmation from US researchers that this type of study is going on. Dr. Janet Morris, coauthor of The Warrior's Edge, reportedly went to the Moscow Institute of Psycho correlations in 1991. There she was shown a technique pioneered by the Russian Department of Psycho-Correction at Moscow Medical Academy in which researchers electronically analyze the human mind in order to influence it. They input subliminal command messages, using key words transmitted in "white noise" or music. Using an infra-sound, very low frequency transmission, the acoustic psycho-correction message is transmitted via bone conduction. 13
In summary, Chernishev noted that some of the militarily significant aspects of the "psy" weaponry deserve closer research, including the following nontraditional methods for disrupting the psyche of an individual:
• ESP research: determining the properties and condition of objects without ever making contact with them and "reading" peoples' thoughts
• Clairvoyance research: observing objects that are located just beyond the world of the visible-used for intelligence purposes
• Telepathy research: transmitting thoughts over a distance-used for covert operations
• Telekinesis research: actions involving the manipulation of physical objects using thought power, causing them to move or break apart-used against command and control systems, or to disrupt the functioning of weapons of mass destruction
• Psychokinesis research: interfering with the thoughts of individuals, on either the strategic or tactical level
While many US scientists undoubtedly question this research, it receives strong support in Moscow. The point to underscore is that individuals in Russia (and other countries as well) believe these means can be used to attack or steal from the data-processing unit of the human body.
Solutsev's research, mentioned above, differs slightly from that of Chernishev. For example, Solntsev is more interested in hardware capabilities, specifically the study of the information-energy source associated with the computer-operator interface. He stresses that if these energy sources can be captured and integrated into the modern computer, the result will be a network worth more than "a simple sum of its components." Other researchers are studying high-frequency generators (those designed to stun the psyche with high frequency waves such as electromagnetic, acoustic, and gravitational); the manipulation or reconstruction of someone's thinking through planned measures such as reflexive control processes; the use of psychotronics, parapsychology, bioenergy, bio fields, and psycho energy; 14 and unspecified "special operations" or anti-ESP training.
The last item is of particular interest. According to a Russian TV broadcast, the strategic rocket forces have begun anti-ESP training to ensure that no outside force can take over command and control functions of the force. That is, they are trying to construct a firewall around the heads of the operators.
Conclusions
At the end of July 1997, planners for Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration '97 "focused on technologies that enhance real-time collaborative planning in a multinational task force of the type used in Bosnia and in Operation Desert Storm. The JWID '97 network, called the Coalition Wide Area Network (CWAN), is the first military network that allows allied nations to participate as full and equal partners." 15 The demonstration in effect was a trade fair for private companies to demonstrate their goods; defense ministries got to decide where and how to spend their money wiser, in many cases without incurring the cost of prototypes. It is a good example of doing business better with less. Technologies demonstrated included: 16
• Soldiers using laptop computers to drag cross-hairs over maps to call in air strikes
• Soldiers carrying beepers and mobile phones rather than guns
• Generals tracking movements of every unit, counting the precise number of shells fired around the globe, and inspecting real-time damage inflicted on an enemy, all with multicolored graphics 17
Every account of this exercise emphasized the ability of systems to process data and provide information feedback via the power invested in their microprocessors. The ability to affect or defend the data-processing capability of the human operators of these systems was never mentioned during the exercise; it has received only slight attention during countless exercises over the past several years. The time has come to ask why we appear to be ignoring the operators of our systems. Clearly the information operator, exposed before a vast array of potentially immobilizing weapons, is the weak spot in any nation's military assets. There are few international agreements protecting the individual soldier, and these rely on the good will of the combatants. Some nations, and terrorists of every stripe, don t care about such agreements.
This article has used the term data-processing to demonstrate its importance to ascertaining what so-called information warfare and information operations are all about. Data-processing is the action this nation and others need to protect. Information is nothing more than the output of this activity. As a result, the emphasis on information-related warfare terminology ("information dominance," "information carousel") that has proliferated for a decade does not seem to fit the situation before us. In some cases the battle to affect or protect data-processing elements pits one mechanical system against another. In other cases, mechanical systems may be confronted by the human organism, or vice versa, since humans can usually shut down any mechanical system with the flip of a switch. In reality, the game is about protecting or affecting signals, waves, and impulses that can influence the data-processing elements of systems, computers, or people. We are potentially the biggest victims of information warfare, because we have neglected to protect ourselves.
Our obsession with a "system of systems," "information dominance," and other such terminology is most likely a leading cause of our neglect of the human factor in our theories of information warfare. It is time to change our terminology and our conceptual paradigm. Our terminology is confusing us and sending us in directions that deal primarily with the hardware, software, and communications components of the data-processing spectrum. We need to spend more time researching how to protect the humans in our data management structures. Nothing in those structures can be sustained if our operators have been debilitated by potential adversaries or terrorists who- right now-may be designing the means to disrupt the human component of our carefully constructed notion of a system of systems.
ENDNOTES
1. I. Chemishev, "Can Rulers Make 'Zombies' and Control the World?" Orienteer, February 1997, pp. 58-62. BACK
2. Douglas Pastemak, "Wonder Weapons," U.S. News and World Report, 7 July 1997, pp. 3846. BACK
3. Ibid., p. 38. BACK
4. FM 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics, 30 September 1997, p. 1-82. BACK
5. Joint Pub 3-13.1, Joint Doctrine for Command and Control Warfare (C2W), 7 February 1996, p. v. BACK
6. The American Heritage Dictionary (2d College Ed.; Boston: Houghton Mfflin, 1982), p. 660, definition 4. BACK
7. Denis Snezhnyy, "Cybemetic Battlefield & National Security," Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, No. 10, 15-21 March 1997, p. 2. BACK
8. Victor I. Solntsev, "Information War and Some Aspects of a Computer Operator's Defense, " talk given at an Infer Conference in Washington, D.C., September 1996, sponsored by the National Computer Security Association. Information in this section is based on notes from Dr. Solntsev's talk. BACK
9. Pastemak, p. 40. BACK
10. Ibid., pp. 40-46. BACK
11. Ibid. BACK
12. Larry Dodgen, "Nonlethal Weapons," U.S. News and World Report, 4 August 1997, p. 5. BACK
13. "Background on the Aviary," Nexus Magazine, downloaded from the Internet on 13 July
14. AleksandrCherkasov, "The Front Where Shots Aren't Fired," Orienteer, May 1995, p. 45. This article was based on information in the foreign and Russian press, according to the author, making it impossible to pinpoint what his source was for this reference. BACK
15. Bob Brewin, "DOD looks for IT 'golden nuggets,"' Federal Computer Week, 28 July 1997, p. 31, as taken from the Earlybird Supplement, 4 August 1997, p. B 17. BACK
16. Oliver August, "Zap! Hard day at the office for NATO's laptop warriors," The Times, 28 July 1997, as taken from the Earlybird Supplement, 4 August 1997, p. B 16. BACK
17. Ibid. BACK
My Comments:
[1] pulsating lights—it is used to cover up the real technology. The pulsating light itself should not induce seizure. It is the certain energy wave stimulating the nerve system.
Reply
Monday 16 May
By tbok
Heidi,
Your article is very interesting. If you have anymore information about this subject, I would be very interested in reading it.
Thank you,
tbok
Sunday 10 October
By anita
i remember watching oprah once she did a show about making extra money this way if you are willing its good money i remember she had one guy on who got paid like five grand to get injected with milaria ( not sure if proper spelling probably not ) so they could test more effective treatment drugs there is good money in it and most of the time the physical exams are free
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By cqdeed
Hey, think of it this way. The gene pool will be purged of idiots. Unless a side effect is to mutate the genes. LOL.
Reply
Sunday 10 October
By Alis
You will see all the results of this testing when you are going to be 50 !
Reply
Monday 11 October
By envp
There has to be a safer and smarter way to earn a living. What happens when months or years from now you die very young because of all of this testing? What is your life worth to you?
Reply
Monday 15 November
By rhonda
LabRat. Hmm. That term is antiquated, and incorrect as well. LabRats are not given a chance to consent; Human Subjects are given Informed Consent documents prior to participating in any clinical trial. These documents are detailed and lengthy--purposefully so that a person can read everything known about the drug--the risks, the benefits, etc, how the study is set up, and what is required of them. Not every study is the same, not all studies have the same risk. How do you think our current drugs got approved, anyway? It's because of those of us who volunteer. Of course it's not always easy, but research sites have to look out first for human safety, and cannot continue a study where the risk outweighs the benefit. Reputable sites will always put you first, science second. May drugs that make it to approval are life-savers, while others make it through only to find out they have issues not seen on the clinical trials. This is why we need more voluteers to do clinical trials--to help find out everything possible about a drug before it gets to market. Volunteering is not for everyone, just as volunteering at a pet shelter isn't for everyone. I look at clinical trials volunteers as an elite group of people--those who would pretty much do anything to help someone else in any situation. Like one gentleman put it--a lot of study volunteers do a lot more harm to themselves over a weekend then they have harm induced on them in a clinical trial. There are rare cases that turn out with long-term side effects--but that is the risk--sometimes it's known,and sometimes it is not known. God Bless those who are willing to give their time & bodies for this purpose, for humankind will hopefully be able live longer healthier lives, and/or have better treatments for what ails them--all thanks to those who give their precious time and make informed decisions about doing so.
Reply