However, reaching the closed-up train hubs of New York City often means sneaking into unauthorized areas, where you'll face rat posses and possible jail time. But, now you can view the prettiest of all abandoned stations -- legally! -- from the comfort of your own urine-scented subway car.

The old City Hall station (above), which was built in 1904, closed 41 years later to accommodate longer trains. Since then, it's been boarded up and hidden from the public, which is a real shame considering that it's like the Ritz Carlton of subway stations -- tall tile arches, skylights and glitzy brass fixtures run along the curve of the platform.
As Jalopnik reports, you can view the glamorous "miniature Grand Central station" by simply staying put on the 6 train when you reach the end of the line at the new City Hall stop. In the past, they'd make commuters exit the train before it turned around, but now you can stay on, as the train will pass by the City Hall station of yore.
The reflection of the train's lights in the window make it hard to see, so you'll have to push your face against the glass if you want a good view. Then make sure to scrub yourself afterward, because you don't know where that window has been.
Keep reading for more photos of the old-timey station.





























Live from Google I/O's 2013 opening keynote!
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Save on Spring Cleaning With a New Vacuum -- Savings Experiment
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
BBC Host Paula White Pulled Off Air After Sounding Drunk
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions







Comments:
Add a comment
Sunday 14 November
By connie
Looks like Italian craftsmen put their signature on this...
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Elizabeth Derr
Interesting and fun.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By jim
After forty years in New York, I saw and rode through many transitions of the subway systems, One thing still remember is the third avenue ovehead rail. I am sure there are many closed stations that are beautiful that we will never see, as they have outserved there usefullness.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Freddie
I love New York, and ride the subway when I visit, but the system is ugly and hot. I've been all over Europe, and the system in Paris is amazing. In Paris, there's a map above every door that helps you figure out where to exit and connect with another line: in NY's subway cars, there is nothing to help you figure where you're going or where to exit. In Paris, it's like a museum down there: benches, tile, artwork. In NY, there's wooden posts and beams, terrible ventilaton, and you have ask someone where the stops are and how to connect to another line. The people in New York are helpful and friendly, and I mean that: the notion that they are standoffish and unhelpful is a lie. But of all the subways I have been on, New York's is the worst. A great city like that needs a better system: their transit folks should study Moscow's, or London's, or Paris' to see what a clean, attractive, efficent system looks like. More people would ride it if it were modernized and improved.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By carole
I remember only one ride on the Subway in New York while I was visiting...I love New York BUT I had to get off and OUT of the subway...Sorry! I felt absolutely trapped in it..Guess it being my first time underground was a bit more than I could take...All I could think about was what IF....We did get off down in the Bowery...LOL Wasn't exactly prime property there...But felt very safe as it was during mid-day...We walked back to where we had been and took a Taxi from there on or walked to where we wanted to be...My husband got upset with me because I got tired of his 'I THINK WE Go....' and I said I'm asking somebody and interupted a gentleman walking to his destination and asked him where such and such was....He was very gracious and gave us instructions...My husband said, 'He probably thought you were a nut to ask him and was shocked by it and the info just flowed out of him because you might attack him next.' I told him people are people everywhere and if you just ask they usually will be quite willing to help you...Besides if that was the case I gave him something to talk about over dinner that evening...LOL I LOVE NEW YORK JUST NOT UNDERGROUND!
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Bobby
You bettertell your husband to get a reality check. I'm from Manhattan,and at times I need directions. I have never met another New Yorker that wasn;t helpful and above board. I'm talking about a "real" New Yorker (like myself) Not some, transported person that was born and raised in another state, and came to NY either because of work, or school, etc. True New Yorkers are those that are born and raised in the City. Not a misplaced person who thinks he/she is a New Yorker.
Sunday 14 November
By nsheats
Beautiful. Its a good example how we throw away the good and keep / build the mediocre.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By jeani
I STARTED RIDING THE NY SUBWAY SYSTEM IN THE LATE 40'S. IT WAS
CLEAN THEN BUT, STARTED GETTING SMELLY AND DIRTY IN THE LATE 50'S.THAT'S WHEN IT STARTED GETTING SCARY GOING TO AND FROM WORK, WHERE I WORKED ON JOHN STREET, DOWNTOWN NEAR WALL STREET.
I HAD SEVERAL NOT SO FAVORABLE EXPERIENCES, AS I'M SURE OTHER GIRLS DID IN THOSE DAYS.
WE WOULD START AT THE CANARSIE TRAIN STATION ON ROCKAWAY PARKWAY,
THEN EITHER TAKE THE ESCALATOR TO THE IRT OR STAY ON THE CANARSIE LINE TO FOURTEEN STREET OR FURTHER. SOMETIMES I WOULD
GET OFF AT FULTON STREET IN THE A & S STORE! I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT WAS NEAT TO WALK INTO A&S BARGAIN BASEMENT? WHEN I WENT BACK TO VISIT YEARS LATER AND MANY STATES LATER, WE WERE SURPRISED TO SEE POLICE WITH WALKIE TALKIES AND THE TRAINS GET
A REASONABLE FACELIFT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE CITY STATION. I DON'T EVER REMEMBER SEEING OR HEARING ABOUT THIS BEAUTIFUL NY TREASURE. I THING IT SHOULD BE OPEN FOR SIGHTSEERS, BUT PROBABLY BE ROPED OFF FOR SECURITY PURPOSES. I'M SURE THOSE WHO
STILL LIVE IN NY WOULD HAVE MANY STORIES TO TELL. WE HAVE A CANARSIE WEBSITE, HOWABOUT A "BIG APPLE STORY WEBSITE"........
Sunday 14 November
By CANY
I've seen photos of a subway in Russia that would put most cities to shame, maybe even Sao Paolo. I think there are a few subways in this world nicer than the dark and somewhat dirty NY subway but not many subways move you around a great city like NY. It would be nice to be able to afford to make every station beautiful but that's not going to happen. It would be nice to see this gorgeous station open to show us what our subway stations could be like if we lived in a world where people respected property and kept it clean. But, there are some cool things in the NY subway that most people don't even know are there. How many people know you can make music by passing your hand across the green boxes above the tracks at the 34th street station? When no trains are in the station at all there are radio waves transmitted to other boxes on the other side of the station. Break those waves with you hand and you hear music. I can't reach high enough because I'm short but most tall people have no problem. People have forgotten about the music boxes so try it next time you're there and see how shocked people are.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Dag-nub-it
In this "I am going to sue you" society,I can understand why the station is closed. One only has to look at the curve of the track & platform to realize that it would only be time before someone careless individual entering/exiting the car would slip in the rather large space between the car and the platform.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Frostie
Amazingly beautiful !
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By billy
It's amazing what's below street level in N.Y.C.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By MichaelSW1
It's amazing to see just what is in the path of the #6 train circling around after it reaches the current BROOKLYN BRIDGE-CITY HALL station on the Downtown Side, where the route ends, and the train circles around (underneath the continuing Brooklyn-bound 4 & 5 train I guess) and comes up the Uptown Side to begin its trip back to the Bronx, Pelham Bay section. And it's true-commuters were told to leave the train on the downtown side platform and they had to go up and walk onto the other side platform to go uptown. First it was said for safety reasons (safety reasons of whom--the passengers currently on an out of service train? The MTA Personnel currently on an out of service train with extra unexpected passengers?)
But let's face it. That train has circled around with homeless people in the cars that are NOT the front/first car with the Motorman or the Fifth/Sixth car with the Conductor (who opens & closes the doors). So perhaps the safety issue for personnel goes out the window. And as far as passenger safety concerns go--MAYBE. But that is an ongoing circling path for the #6 train that can never go BLOCKED. If heaven forbid something was to happen along that path where a circling train is stopped for whatever reason, that will stop and delay any and all downtown #6 trains behind that circling train and would warrant immediate response and corrective action from emergency personnel. All in all, with the uptown #6 local track path cleared on the Uptown platform of the Brooklyn Bridge-City Hall station, it should take that #6 train leaving the Downtown platform up to a certain amount of time to circle around and reach the uptown platform. Any longer time taken would question if there was a problem, just out of concern.
But now, the sighting of this closed station is certainly a tourist attraction--not to necesarily stop, visit, and explore, but is certainly awesome to see as the train passes through it en route to the uptown platform to resume service. And given the MTA's not-so good standings with commuters and the public with questionable quality of service, questionable continual service cuts, and above all, questionable continual fare hikes, one would easily suggest that this abandoned station would add to the list of interrogative questions towards the MTA.
As stated earlier, it is true passengers initially had to exit the #6 train on the downtown side at Brooklyn Bridge/City Hall station, climb the stairs & cross over to the #6 train uptown side if they wanted to return uptown. That was a huge inconvenience for many. But now it's true that the #6 Train, after arriving on the Downtown Brooklyn Bridge platform, announces: "The next stop is Brooklyn Bridge-City Hall, on the Uptown Side". So why would such an announcement be made as if allowing passengers to remain onboard as the train circles around? One likely reason is due to the Canal Street and/or the Bleecker Street stations. Both stations are direct transfers from other subway lines (Bleecker Street having the B,D,F lines; Canal Street having the N,R,Q lines). However one, if not both of those station transfers are for the Downtown #6 line only; the lettered subway lines do not have a direct transfer connection to the Uptown #6 line, causing passengers transferring from these lettered lines needing the #6 to board exclusively on the Downtown #6 train and head to Brooklyn Bridge, where before they had to depart, climb up and over onto the Uptown #6 line platform. This is especially inconvenient to those who have problems climbing up & down stairs and where although the station does have elevators, there is frequently one out of service which defeats the entire non-stairs transfer purpose. So it seems, given these circumstances, that MTA "has" to allow Downtown #6 passengers to remain onboard as the train circles around to the Uptown side, enabling them to see the many wonders of what is along the circling path, that being this classy abandoned City Hall station--or seeing it from the first car; the front window is usually clear of viewing obstruction and the motorman is safely secured within his cabinet, safe from any trespassing outsiders.
The article says that the station was closed due to the fact that as more cars were added on, the station was not large enough to accomodate all the subway cars. Legitimate explanation and then again--not so legitimate. The #1 train to South Ferry had the condition that passengers wishing to exit at South Ferry needed to be in the first/front five cars to exit; that the last/rear five cars would not reach the platform and thus the doors would not open. And now, because there is no passage from the 5th to the 6th cars (conductor's cars), signs have been posted in every car regarding this stop and the conditions to be met if people were going to this stop. In addition, the conductor made the reminder announcement in certain stops near South Ferry and kept the doors open to enable passengers to make the necessary transfer to the designated cars before continuing to the South Ferry destination. Of course this was BEFORE the station rehabilitation and rebuilding where there is now a NEW South Ferry station accomodating all 10 cars and a direct transfer connection to another subway line, whereas the previous station did not have that transfer connect, causing commuters to exit the station and enter the other, paying an additional fare.
But the first five car exit requirement still remains on another subway line. The #3 train, on both Downtown & Uptown sides require passengers to be in the first/front five cars to ext at the 145th Street station in Harlem. This station and the particular subway line has the same criteria & conditions as the #1 train once had.
So one would have to ask: just how long is this abandoned City Hall station? Is it long enough to accompany five cars? Could the MTA not provide the same criteria on the #6 line? Could they not have it where after entering the Brooklyn Bridge station, thye announce: "This is Brooklyn Bridge. The next stop is City Hall. For City Hall, you must be in the first five cars to exit, the last five cars will not open up. If you miss City Hall or remain in the last five cars, the next stop will be Brooklyn Bridge on the Uptown side, where you can get off and access City Hall from a slightly longer distance. Once again, City Hall next stop--you must be in the first five cars to exit. Please make your way to the first five cars to exit." Then wait a moment, then announce "Stand clear of the closing doors".
They really ought to reopen that station. Is it security reasons? It certainly would be bogus back when Rudy Giuliani was mayor, of course before 9-11. But given 9-11, a lot may have changed where many would cite the infamous day for every reason to decline suggestions such as this. Otherwise reopening the station may generate revenue and stimulate the economy.
As it stands, just to access City Hall & its neighboring stores such as the famous J&R Music World located across from City Hall, it's a considerable climb up the stairs to the outside from either the Brooklyn Bridge station, or another subway station on the 4 and 5 express track south of the Brooklyn Bridge station, namely Fulton Street, and a considerable walk thereafter to either destination--both locations are right set in the middle between the two stations. Upon knowing just where this City Hall station is, I'm guessing it's a direct access to City Hall and would put the commuters that much closer to the landmark as well as the J&R Stores. MTA should really consider cleaning up and reopening that station. It might serve the public good.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By MichaelSW1
In response to Dag's concerns about lawsuits due to passengers falling or tripping in gaps between subway cars & platforms: that's why they have MOVING/EXTENDING PLATFORMS, where they would extend out upon a train's arrival to close those gaps. They had it with the old South Ferry Station (#1 train line) before the station renovation. And they currently have it on the 4,5,6 Downtown lines at 14th Street--Union Square. So likewise, they could have it at this City Hall station as well.
Good eye on your part to see the potential hazard, but, as I pointed out, it's something that can be resolved and still have that station reopened.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Roger
Does anyone remember a radio program (maybe 50 years ago) named Grand Central Station (nee Terminal)? The show opened with; "As the bullet seeks its target shining rails in this great nation are aimed at Grand Central Station, cross roads of a million private lives on whose stage are played a thousand dramas daily..." It was a great show...at least to us old timers.
Little did I know at that time that I would be commuting through the Terminal for 15 years to work in the Graybar building. Love the Oyster bar down below!!!
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Tim Carney
Believe this was the first of the subway stations in New York. The designer and builder was Catalan immigrant R. Guastavino whose company also built the vault for the church of St. John the Divine and the Oyster Bar at what we know properly as Grand Central Terminal, as well as many other buildings in NYC and across the U.S.; e.g., the Nebraska State Capital in Lincoln. See the new book on Guastavino by MIT Prof. John Ochsendorf from Princeton Architectural Press.
Sunday 14 November
By Bobby
~OK Listen up folks..........The reason that the City Hall Station was closed in the first place was for the tempataion of "bomb threats" That's right. Has nothing to do with longer or shorter trains. Was closed due to the fact that it was direclty under City Hall. This came from a great source who new the subways systems all his life. Worked for the subway, when the subway was called the IRT (Independant Rapid Transit) MY Dad retired as Superintendant.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Bobby (again)
Here's another bit of information: Thye open the City Hall station once every year to allow New Yorkers a chance to stop and see the City Hall Station. Call City Hall and get information.
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Bobby
Why the hell don't you write a book? This space is for comments not long winded people. Write a Book!
Reply
Sunday 14 November
By Richard
The original City Hall Station is truly a work of art. It was built in the early 20th Century, when the European look was popular. Several NYC buildings which were built during that period are very ornate. I especially like the old Police Building on Lafayette St. It looks like something out of Florence, Italy. The other stations on the original IRT line, were not nearly as ornate as the old City Hall Station, but they did have freize inlays in the ceilings and some artistic tile work.
Reply