People rated attractive as children are more likely to grow up and have daughters compared to those who are rated unattractive.Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa, who teaches at the London School of Economics, was able to get access to information about 17,000 children who were born in 1958 and evaluated on their attractiveness in 1965. He then interviewed the participants in that study at age 45, and found that those who had been marked as unattractive were parents of boys 56 percent of the time. The gender ratio of the attractive subjects' offspring was about 50/50.
Kanazawa's quick explanation: Attractiveness is more valuable to men in choosing mates (than to women), and that fact is likely driving this disparity in offspring gender.
Other scientists are skeptical of these findings, but it could just be that they're bitter because they have a bunch of sons.


























'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Baby Fox Asks for Help
Lost Dog Found 500 Miles Away
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work







Comments:
Add a comment
Tuesday 30 November
By jo
What a bunch of bullocks
Reply
Friday 17 December
By Everbody
I concur.
Tuesday 30 November
By Laura At The Beach
I know this is true. My ugly half sister had nothing
but boys from all of her different boyfriends, while
her husband was at sea in the Navy..
And I had Beautiful daughters to die for..!!!
Reply
Tuesday 30 November
By maggiies
Laura, the man determines the sex of the child.
Wednesday 01 December
By Digi
I don't think either of your kids are more attractive than your own sisters....but I do think your sister got stuck with the chump deal of having a b*tch like you for a sis. To literally broadcast to the world that your own sister is ugly therefore has boys, and that you yourself is 'beautiful' wow, if your head got any larger I'd have to do a plumbing check............whatta bi*ch. I feel sorry for your sister.
Tuesday 30 November
By WILL
My mother in-law says you have to go deep to have a boy , I guess tom cruise didnt get that email , I btw have a son
Reply
Tuesday 30 November
By al sat
your mother in-law is ignorant if that is true there would be no stallion
Tuesday 30 November
By Annie
I know extremely attractive people who just have sons. I am finding this study hard to believe.
Reply
Tuesday 30 November
By Jess
I'm not making the connection in their explanation of the results. Obviously men are more picky about looks, but why does that make them have daughters?
Reply
Tuesday 30 November
By saechao
from science man has XY and woman has XX that is why more daughters, in fact there are a lot more woman in the world than the men
Reply
Thursday 02 December
By lei
Huh? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying more female children are born because males have penises and females have vaginas--there is no correlation. Also, a female's attractiveness would be irrelevant as the male determines the sex of a child. Not to mention, beauty/attractiveness is subjective and that fact would negate the argument if nothing else could/would.
"...in fact there are a lot more wom[e]n in the world than the men"
MEN WOULD OUTNUMBER WOMEN quite a bit if every male born survived to adulthood. Globally, there are 105 MALES BORN FOR EVERY 100 FEMALES born. (2009 Statistics | United Nations Statistics Division/Demographic and Social Statistics)
Wednesday 01 December
By Lynn
Another dumb study that is soo untrue
Reply
Wednesday 01 December
By BKN
Hope this dude didn't get any $$ for this study, sounds to me like he was just either sucking up to his wife or pissed at his mom (because according to his own study his mum would be "unattractive"). What about Heidi Klum, Gisele Bundchen, Cindy Crawford, etc. of models that have sons? Must be some kind of fluke in his research.
Reply
Wednesday 01 December
By Digi
Its bogus off the bat simply cause attractiveness is individually perceived. What one person finds ugly another may find beautiful etc. SO by that alone makes this study bogus.
Wednesday 01 December
By sandy
I have a girl and a boy does that mean I'm only somewhat attractive? I'm 5'8" 108 lbs and a size 0. Check out my facebook photo and decide for yourself.
Reply
Wednesday 01 December
By sandy
One other thing. Being that the males sperm decides what the gender of the fetus will be (all womens eggs are female), how does attractiveness factor in? Does the guy who finds his mate extremely attractive produce more xx than xy sperm, perhaps? There needs to be more scientific study done before a finding like this should make news.
Reply
Wednesday 01 December
By Digi
considering the difference is ultimately a matter of only 6% its called CHAOTIC RANDOMNESS. This isn't science...its AVERAGES. That's the whole 'joy' of the world is to have anomalous things like this occur. There is no precursor like attractiveness because then you would be saying HUMANS OWN PERSONAL PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS ATTRACTIVE IS WHAT IS CAUSING THE GENDER CHANGE. MEANING YOU ARE LITERALLY SAYING GENDER IS IN A WAY A CONSCIOUS THOUGHT/CONTROL. EVERYONE HAS DIFFERENT OPINIONS OF WHAT IS ATTRACTIVE THEREFORE CONTRADICTING THIS WHOLE STUDY. This study is BS, ignoring reality to make up some chumped up reason to get more research money. Science FAIL!
Reply
Wednesday 01 December
By Elisa
So they rated 7 year olds on how attractive they were... that doesn't sound odd to anyone else.
Reply
Thursday 02 December
By Mary
This sounds like hogwash. Anyone will tell you that they know
extremely attractive, beautiful people who have many or all sons
in their family. My husband and I have 2 sons and a daughter.
We were never in our younger years considered unattractive -
in fact we were both considered well above the standard (whatever
that might be) for being handsome and pretty. This is just
ridiculous. Don't believe everything on the internet. How stupid.
Thursday 02 December
By nikki
The stupidest thing I've ever heard a psychologist say! what baby's gender has to do with attractiveness?? @saecao, you need to get your facts right, there is a 50-50 chance of conceiving a girl or a boy if you're only considering cromozomes xx xy xx xy, get it??
Reply