Residents of Milwaukee get the most smashed.The Daily Beast developed a drunkenness matrix to rate cities on how intoxicated their citizens are. The metric is based on average number of drinks per person per month, percentage of adults who are heavy drinkers, percentage of adults who are binge drinkers and deaths per 100,000 residents from liver cancer. Following Milwaukee, a city associated with beer production, were Fargo, N.D.; San Francisco; Austin; and Reno, Nev.
Considering only average drinks per person, per month, Milwaukee doesn't rate particularly high, trailing Austin; Boston (eighth overall); and Anchorage, Alaska (ninth), among other cities.
However, that could just prove the point that the folks in Milwaukee aren't sipping a glass of wine a day to keep their heart strong -- they're just out there on Friday nights drinking like there's no tomorrow.


























Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions
Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S 4 running stock Android 4.2
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Bill Gates regains title of world's richest person as Microsoft stock hits five-year high







Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 31 December
By GrownFolk.us
I would of never thought Milwaukee was the drunkest city in the United States; especially over Las Vegas.
Reply
Friday 07 January
By Eric
12.76 per month? Is that it?
Sheesh, that is like 1.5 beers per day, I don't believe it.
I knew people in Balamore (HOTeL Baltimore) that drank a six pack a night, easy.
Two martini's with lunch on the weekdays or in the evening with robe and slippers, pipe clenched askew on lips at a jaunty angle, would put one at ten drinks a week.
Reply