He was there to show the public how to spot interesting sights in the night sky -- which made it all the more embarrassing for astronomer Mark Thompson when he missed seeing a meteor on live TV.During the recent BBC series "Stargazing LIVE" Thompson had been advising people on how to identify constellations and see other things worth looking out for.
But on one of the live shows -- speaking from a field near the Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics -- he said that cloud cover was so bad there was nothing interesting to see ... and that's when it happened. A meteor whizzed across behind him in what appeared to be the only bit of clear sky that night.
Unaware of what had just happened, Thompson then continued moaning about the cloud cover and lack of visibility, adding, "There's not too much to be seen at the moment."
However, viewers were quick to point out the gaffe and bombarded the BBC with phone calls and messages on their website.
Speaking after the blunder was pointed out to him, Thompson said, "I must admit I was oblivious to it. I think I'm probably the only person in the entire country who didn't see it." Check below for the video.
La Carmina: Steampunk in Japan: Tokyo Subculture Style (PHOTOS)


























Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl







Comments:
Add a comment
Sunday 09 January
By aJM33771
Which part of, "his back was turned as he was speaking when the event occurred" did the IDIOT writing this story NOT understand? Must've been a REAL slow news day eh? What do you think AJM?
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Hanna
Alastair Plumnb....This was the worst coverage ever.
May I suggest a quick bruxh up in writing 101.
Who, what, when, where and.... WHY!
Sunday 09 January
By Al Schrader
To David Wade - It's a slow moving meteor right at the start of the clip in the upper left of your screen. I've seen similar ones light up a cloud. It's amazing. Tons of this stuff comes in every day. Even though they break-up the material they are made of still settles to the earth & gets washed in by rain & weather. It's this material that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, not some catastrophe & why the dinos are buried along with the oil. As this stuff arrives, the earth gets heavier & is moving away from the sun. The resulting "fatter" earth has more gravity & colder un-dino friendly temps & is why they went extinct. Of course, this occurs over a very long time so don't cancel your Astronomy magazine subscription as yet !...Alfred Schrader-
Monday 10 January
By catyu8piqw
I know we women have lots of standards to pick up a man, and there's one w eb si te that can almost me et all our different demands:( B-l-a-c-k-w-h-i-t-e-C-u-p-i-d / c-0-m ) my sisiter told me this; it worked for her, it worked for me; and i'm sure it's gonna work for u, buddy!!You think that "night vision" camera might have had something to do with it?
Sunday 09 January
By Jane
I guess if he had eyes in the back of his head, he wouldn't have missed it.
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By DaveB
There was no "fail" or blunder here, as the typically mis-leading AOL News headlines would have you believe. There's no way he (or anyone else) could anticipate when and where an individual meteor would appear, especially with heavy cloud cover, as most meteors burn-up well above any cloud level, and he was facing the camera as he should have been.
Sunday 09 January
By Mike
I doubt that the reporter was out there in the field by himself. Therefore, the real question ought to be, "Why didn't the people behind the camera, any of whom should have seen the event clearly, alert the reporter to what was going on behind him?" Not to mention the fact that the event had already begun before the studio switched to the location. If the folks behind the camera had been alert, the first sight of the reporter on screen would have been of him facing away from the camera reacting to the event. The failure here was not the reporter's. The fault lies with whomever was with him.
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Adam
Given that there was no meteor shower that night, and there was only a tiny patch of sky clear anyway, it's pretty likely that was the only meteor they'd captured. So as soon as the cameraman would have alerted him to it, it would have been gone - there would have been no point!
Monday 10 January
By David Wade
What am I missing that others in the comments above are seeing? Three times now I have viewed this clip and three times I fail to view this behind-the-reporter meteor!
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Lara
David, it happens at the very beginning when the astronomer outside begins to talk.
I agree with the other commenter who pointed out yet another AOL misleading link title. There was no blunder here, the guy's back is to the meteorite. And as far as the cameraman seeing it, I'd imagine the cameraman was focused on the astronomer, at least that'd be the case if he's a decent camerman.
Sunday 09 January
By SFeighner
The meteor occurs just a moment after the folks in the studio cut to the field for the live from the field report. It takes place at the 42 second mark while Mike is saying Hello. It happens very quickly. Less than a second.
And the other posters are correct. This is a very badly written article in which Alastair suggests that the eyes in the back of Michaels head were closed or looking elsewhere and missed the flash of meteor that occured when he was greeting his audience.
Bad Alastair. Bad Alastair.
Good luck.
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Skyler
Alastair Plumb sucks...Get a new career!!
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Jeff N
Give the field reporter a break. Geesh. Meteors generally fall much faster through the sky. The viewers were lucky enough to catch this slower moving one. Again, timing is everything. And, even if he had glanced in a monitor surely somewhere to his side, he would have had to glance at the correct moment the thing danced across the sky. He did just fine...
Reply
Sunday 09 January
By Harry
You think that "night vision" camera might have had something to do with it?
Reply
Monday 10 January
By David Wade
Thanks. Nevertheless, I STILL fail to see this "alleged" meteor appearing at the beginning of the footage. At any rate, as William once wrote, this is much ado about nothing. Even if I could spot the thing, I certainly have witnessed many greater "shooting stars" thoughout my life so far.
Reply