Profile

  • Maven
  • Member Since Oct 23rd, 2006

Are you Maven? If So, Login Here.

Recent Comments:

The 12 Craziest Moments From Archie's Christian Comics {ComicsAlliance}

Sep 7th 2010 4:11PM Right, because obviously, only people who have never done anything wrong are allowed to become Christians.

Yahoo! CEO Carol Bartz Tells Michael Arrington to "F*ck Off" {Switched}

May 25th 2010 8:13PM Her arrogant, insulting manner would carry a lot more weight were she CEO of a company that hadn't had their butts stuffed, mounted, and handed directly to them by Google. The thing is: Yahoo was out first, had a couple of years head start, and STILL got destroyed by Google. Maybe it's her "I don't care what anyone else thinks" attitude that got Yahoo where it is today.

Controversial Quotes From 8 of History's Most Revered Heroes {Asylum}

Dec 9th 2009 1:45PM @Glenn Branch: I suppose the irony of your fanatical devotion to the Religion of Darwin is entirely lost upon you. But let me clarify something for you: Darwin himself thought "evolution" was a stupid and erroneous concept. Darwin espoused Natural Selection, which is something entirely different from "evolution".

Robot Rock: 11 Great Comic Book Robots {ComicsAlliance}

Sep 24th 2009 12:53PM Actually, the best name in all of comics is "Negasonic Teenaged Warhead". Upon being introduced, Kitty Pryde remarked "We really HAVE run out of names, haven't we?"

Ukraine outlaws possession of porn, but can't define what it is {WalletPop}

Jul 4th 2009 8:41PM Why is it that people like the author of this article always pretend to be too stupid to understand the difference between porn and art? I've found that the average human being (when not pretending to be an idiot for ideological reason on the Internet) has no problem at all differentiating between art and porn. Pornographers certainly have no problem doing so. No, it's only snarky teenaged morons on the Web who claim to lack the higher brain functions necessary to tell them that "Anal Drillers 4" is probably Porn.

Eli Roth: A Neo-Nazi Sarah Palin? {Cinematical}

Apr 29th 2009 11:56PM Well, now I'm pretty sure you're an idiot.

Lame in 2007: MPAA Ratings (#23) {Cinematical}

Dec 18th 2007 1:48PM The only reason pinheaded morons want to get rid of the Ratings board is because they absolutely DO NOT WANT people to be able to make informed choices about the movies they see. The Ratings board has NEVER forced a single Director to change a single scene in a movie. Studios are free to release movies without ratings. But then assholes like the people on this site whine that "people won't go see unrated movies". Well, guess why that is, you hypocritical idiots: it's because people WANT to know what kind of movie they're going to see!

As for "unrated" DvDs selling more than "rated" DvDs... that's true, if the movie you're talking about is "Seed of Chucky" or "Hostel 2". The kind of mouthbreathing cretins that go see those kinds of movies most definitely want the crudest version possible. But the world isn't exactly holding it's breath for "unrated" versions of GOOD movies.

iPod touch dark screen problems {TUAW.com}

Sep 21st 2007 5:54PM To the guy that said "The Ipod Touch is using a TN panel, which means the negative effect is a normal phenomenon" - Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about. I note that every other iPod I have, AND my iPhone, all have acceptable screens. Only my Touch is defective. Are you honestly trying to tell us that Apple purposely decided to use a crappy screen on the Touch, when they already have access to GOOD screens on their other products? As for the Touch being "cheap"- I have no idea what kind of Stupid Pills you're taking, but $300 for an 8-gig .mp3 player (and that's all the Touch is, thanks to the crappy screen) is hardly "cheap".

Quentin Tarantino turns down Heroes gig {AOL TV}

Sep 20th 2007 11:02AM Reading through these comments, all I can say is: Tarantino STILL has this many buttkissing Fanboys? Wow.

Tarantino had one great movie: "Pulp Fiction." And he had two mediocre, pander-to-morons movies: "Kill Bill 1&2". Everything else he's ever done has either been forgettable crap like "Jackie Brown", or television shows. And really, you could have a trained chimp direct the average television show.

Civil War #7 {ComicsAlliance}

Mar 7th 2007 1:05PM So basically, you hated Civil War #7 because it didn't degenerate into some idiotic "Cap kills Iron Man, and then the New Yorkers cheer him, because they don't mind having their city destroyed as long as it's a Marvel Hero who does it" story. Does that sum up your feelings on the matter?

The problem with Fanboys like you is that you have your heads so far up your backsides regarding your 'favorite hero' that you don't give a damn about things like "logic" or "believability". You basically wanted Cap to continue killing American civilians. That's incredibly stupid. You only feel that way because to you, the civilians don't matter, and don't exist. You just want to cheer on Cap. Millar, on the other hand, was trying to write a story that WASN'T just a pin-headed Fanboy fantasy- he was trying to portray how real people would react.

Yes, civilians would have cheered Tony Stark. Sure, Tony used "supervillians"- but that's a designation that's only important to Fanboys. A real person wouldn't see much difference between spandex-covered idiots destroying their cities.